Jump to content

DoubleYou

Administrator
  • Posts

    7,935
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DoubleYou

  1. From your description, you most likely forgot to set Level32=1 in the same Edit Scripts/DynDOLOD/DynDOLOD_SSE.ini file that you were in earlier. Failure to do this causes the game LOD to be completely out of whack like you are describing.
  2. My guess then is the registry key for the install path is missing or incorrect. This is normally fixed by running the Skyrim Launcher from the installed location.
  3. I think it isn't really an issue if you don't add mods with lots of additional NPCs. Not sure though. The Civil War battles probably have the most actors in vanilla.
  4. I believe that you can just disable them in that case.
  5. Grass cache is installed with the Step Patch - Conflict Resolution, which allows you to generate grass LODs. If you still can't select grass LOD, you probably forgot to set GrassGID=gid in the Edit Scripts/DynDOLOD/DynDOLOD_SSE.ini file.
  6. I really had thought that one of the big fix mods included this. Looking things over, I must assume that none do. Perhaps it was at one time included in Scrambled Bugs and removed in an update? Not sure.
  7. FOV is among the information that gets coded into your save file, and INI changes to it are only visible upon starting a new character. In order to change fov on an existing save, you have to use the FOV console command. Using this and then saving *may* or may not save the new FOV into the save file. It may not persist throughout the life of the save. See this topic where I talk about FOV some more:
  8. Our CC patch is probably unneeded now, as it looks like he might have fixed this officially. I checked More Accurate Collision, and it's fine. Not sure what mod is that "Patch for EVLas" ... isn't that this mod?
  9. This mod never updated with Majestic Mountains version 4, so we likely can't use it anymore, since T4 reworked his meshes. The author has indicated his intention to update, however.
  10. This happens on both xEdit and LOOT? Do any applications work when run through Mod Organizer? What is the warning notification that is active in Mod Organizer?
  11. What version of the game are you using? Steam? GOG? There may be workarounds required for different versions.
  12. That's fine. I too like our current replacer, having used it since LE days. I thought this mod followed the vanilla design better, without any regard to if the vanilla design made sense, and I'd say the differences in size are just artistic liberty with perhaps a hint of performance optimization (larger scale, less triangles required).
  13. That's a perfectly sensible thing to do. I like the change. It simplifies things.
  14. Sounds like something that could be patched, although probably better if the mod author did it.
  15. I thought we had a few mods that conflicted with some of these fixes. Specifically, I thought we had an alternative soul gem fix in the guide. Let me review.
  16. You would remove the dependency on the lite version and add the full version.
  17. If you are using the LOD32 version of A Clear Map of Skyrim, ensure that you have input the required tweak into the DynDOLOD ini file prior to generation.
  18. You are correct. I personally am against the usage of the custom INI, as there is no need for its existence. It can only override Skyrim.ini (it does NOT override SkyrimPrefs.ini by default), so it adds unnecessary redundancy.
  19. iMaxAllocatedMemoryBytes:Papyrus works in Skyrim.ini or SkyrimCustom.ini. It won't work in SkyrimPrefs.ini.
  20. Conflicts with ECO. Might not be needed.
  21. Looking through xEdit, this mod's conflicts are a bit of a mess. We should compare against Quest Tags Redux because it looks like it may be better in this regard. This may honestly be a good candidate for a Synthesis patcher.
  22. Discussion topic: Quest Tags Redux by ThePrinceOfHell Wiki Link Test against Quests Tags - Factions and radiants and more
  23. Looks more like you are missing a terrain noise texture with sufficient noise to make it not look blurry.
  24. Discussion topic: DLC Timing UFO4P Patch by VishVadeva50 Wiki Link While checking conflicts, I saw this mod needed a patch, to which I found that VishVadeva50 has already provided for us as an esp replacement.
  25. Thinking about this further, I don't like the idea of hiding the textures. There is at least one specular texture that it adds that isn't provided by the game/mods, and it would be missing. So I am going to opt for choice 2: Keep the textures ba2 and allow it to overwrite our texture mod's speculars and hope they look ok. Given the nature of the guide mostly sticking to similar-to-vanilla textures anyway, I think it rather unlikely there'd be an issue where this would be problematic.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Use.