Jump to content

z929669

Administrator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,086

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by z929669

  1. z929669
    I'm betting it is identical, but I agree.
  2. z929669
    Seems fair ... but can you merge some of what you have done in regards to WS into RS? Having shadows from windows in iteriors, I mean. Then, who cares about this mod.
  3. z929669
    The whole thing? This mod seems to have "3D Snowberries" ... misnamed for HD snowberries?? And 3D Junipers ... I could've sworn we had a juniper mod accepted, but I cannot find it.
  4. z929669
    Agree
  5. z929669
    Hmmm ... seems like you should port what you want from it into RS-WS then and be done with their ADHD. Then we can toss it and use RS
  6. z929669
    I have the standard version and didn't even know about the beta for RS EDIT: I have v7.6 installed ... OMG, 7.6 is not even ... deleted93399393 even has an archived 8.0 beta 3.1 version. Gimme a break. So ... can you recommend the install? Enhancer=no? Light fader=no? I probably will not be using the brighter glow maps, but who the hell knows ...
  7. z929669
    Agree
  8. z929669
    Agree
  9. z929669
    I know, but I recall having to hide downstream meshes relating to fire or embers I think so that these 'win'. May not be necessary though with other related mod configs updated.
  10. z929669
    So don't install SMIM compat meshes?
  11. z929669
    We need to determine exactly what to install and configure for this one. v0.98 Alpha 2 is probably the way to go, but there are also several optional files that we may want as well. I defer to Tech for all of this stuff as the main lighting/ENB developer
  12. z929669
    I'd like to look at this for the WIP guide. I know that some of the meshes will conflict with ELFX, ENB Light, and EmbersXD among others. May need to hide some meshes somewhere.
  13. z929669
    Discussion topic: Enhanced Lights and FX by anamorfus Wiki Link Accepted for v2.0.0 Wiki page updated with complete instructions. We may want to use the meshes
  14. z929669
    Pretty sure this one is 'accepted' but need confirmation
  15. z929669
    OK, so we need to determine if we are accepting this ... I vote 'yes'
  16. z929669
    Marked for testing ... not sure if it's something we want to use, but I defer to Tech as the lighting wizard
  17. z929669
    Recommend drop in favor of EmbersXD (accepted)
  18. z929669
    Need to drop for 2.0.0 in favor of Battle-Ready Candleight Fixes (accepted)
  19. z929669
    Visually incompatible with Embers XD (accepted). Recommend drop ... Compares on Embers XD mod page
  20. z929669
    Not sure if I mentioned this before, but I vote that we move to MM Darkside. It just blends much better with landscape in latest dev guide setup
  21. z929669
    Give it another try. Clear browser cache
  22. z929669
    First image is no longer entirely relevant. Need to update that or remove it.
  23. z929669
    Yeah, I guess I would have named it "Grass xEdit Script - NGIO" @DoubleYou did you get a hold of meh? I see he is active on that Discord sheson linked.
  24. z929669
    I can post some screens when I get my Step install up to date. Lots of mods I need to update yet.
  25. z929669
    Yes, lore friendly ... but I also don't define "vanilla friendly" that strictly. By that definition, any texture replacer that makes any change at all to appearance would not be vanilla 'friendly' (so only upscaled/downscaled textures would be vanilla friendly). Personally, vanilla friendly = compatible with the vanilla aesthetic, because it is consistent with game lore and style. I think we use many mods (including historically 'core' mods) that don't fit that strict definition but we still refer to them as vanilla friendly (at least I do). If tree placement is different, I see your point though, so "lore friendly" is probably more accurate for this one.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Use.

  I accept