Jump to content

z929669

Administrator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,028

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by z929669

  1. z929669
    Probably not the darker fogs, but I honestly haven't tried that option. I think Tech mentioned that we shouldn't use it, but IDK for certain. We need to test the lighting color variation too though. Ideally, compares should be against current Step (Luminosity), but whatever you can do is helpful. I still need to set up and test before I can decide on screen compares.
  2. z929669
    Hey sheson, could you provide a bit of background as to what prompted you to add apparent support for Grass Cache Fixes? What's the scenario this resolves? GrassGID=gid GrassGID=cgid I also see mention of reading GID from BSA and some LODGen support as well for this stuff. I want to keep our guides properly updated with respect to the new version.
  3. z929669
    Discussion topic: Elytra and Bliss Bug ENB Light by wSkeever Wiki Link Seems like a no brainer to me.
  4. z929669
    Ahhh, now I get it I vote to accept this one then and I will create a mod topic for the other mod you linked. Both seem like no brainers for ENB
  5. z929669
    I updated my last post. I recall shadows being an issue with the Maze. It isn't an added download though. It's one or the other, so seems prudent to grab double sided version.
  6. z929669
    Sorry, I'm confused by your last couple of comments, which is why I posted. Are you providing some of the content for this mod? Could you elaborate a bit?
  7. z929669
    But see DuskyB's comment on the Nexus mod topic. Seems logical ... Shalidor's Maze is an example I think
  8. z929669
    Probably should get some screen compares for this one .....
  9. z929669
    I will not be testing this one, so if it's wanted, people will need to advocate using it versus not. Otherwise, it should be removed from testing.
  10. z929669
    I will not be testing this one, so if it's wanted, people will need to advocate using it versus not. Otherwise, it should be removed from testing.
  11. z929669
    I will not be testing this one, so if it's wanted, people will need to advocate using it versus not. Otherwise, it should be removed from testing.
  12. z929669
    I will not be testing this one, so if it's wanted, people will need to advocate using it versus not. Otherwise, it should be removed from testing.
  13. z929669
    I will not be testing this one, so if it's wanted, people will need to advocate using it versus not. Otherwise, it should be removed from testing.
  14. z929669
    I will not be testing this one, so if it's wanted, people will need to advocate using it versus not. Otherwise, it should be removed from testing.
  15. z929669
    I am also not getting a FNIS.esp any longer. All other output is generated though. Strange. I tried without the XPMSSE script fixes and still no dice. The plugin is a dummy and necessary for XP32 Skeleton, so something is amiss.
  16. z929669
    I use first person too. Works for me. I vote to accept as well. Marked accepted for 2.1.0.
  17. z929669
    I don't think this is an improvement. The original concept art was not adopted in the final vanilla implementation, and since this isn't a fix, I vote not to accept this.
  18. z929669
    Discussion topic: Ambiance - A Vanilla(plus) Ambient Lighting Overhaul by TheMilesO Wiki Link This would replace Luminosity and improve RAID compatibility. Test with and without the Light Colors optional plugin. The Step ENB should work fine with this mod. SCREENSHOTS
  19. z929669
    What are your critiques? I will tentatively vote to accept this one if they are minor, since this mod has no 'creep' and it's adding glow to fauna that should be bioluminescent.
  20. z929669
    I'm revising my vote for this one to drop from consideration until/unless the MA improves fidelity and settings coverage. What do you guys think?
  21. z929669
    So what's the vote on this? The issues I posted are largely moot, given the analysis Tech an DY have put into this one. I will vote 'accepted' if either of you chooses to do so.
  22. z929669
    See screens in my previous. Although I don't think LOD necessarily looks better with these LOD meshes, the transition is theoretically better, even if I cannot quantify this difference myself. Also, because this mod should better facilitate retextures and fixes UV problems with the vanilla meshes ... AND has the Cathedral Snow option, I think we should accept it.
  23. z929669
    Please post on the DynDOLOD topic. Hard to tell what's up without TexGen logs. There are many factors. Obviously, you did not follow the guide explicitly, because your path is different from our examples. This is fine, but given the difference, what else could be different? Simpler to post for sheson to diagnose. Again, provide all logs as explained in the OP.
  24. z929669
    Compares are against Step 2.0.0: vanilla LOD >> DynDOLOD Resources LOD >> This mod LOD >> This mod with updated textures ENB No ENB Transitions are noticeable in all three but maybe slightly less with this mod. Hard to compare this objectively. Note: differences in the last screen are due to updating my setup to account for the discovery made by Mousetick in the following post. At this time, we are testing with Ambiance instead of Luminocity and there have been some updates to our ENB and patches affecting lighting and weather. This still provides a clear indication of this mod's mesh improvements, and transitions are definitely better with this mod now with the texture change.
  25. z929669
    I vote accept this one as well, so marked accepted for 2.1.0
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Use.

  I accept