Jump to content

z929669

Administrator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,086

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by z929669

  1. z929669
    Yes, thanks. I missed the version instructions.
  2. z929669
    No worries, I got it figured out
  3. z929669
    Yeah, that's what I mean. He has responded to such questions, albeit without elaboration. He has basically said that it is not redundant with ENB Light when someone said that "it's one or the other". So: the MA has insinuated that both can be run together. See my previous post with link.
  4. z929669
    OK, I will make the change and update 2.0.0 ModList/changelog and 2.1.0 ModList
  5. z929669
    How is this possible? There is no plugin. It's meshes and a DLL. (I honestly don't know) The MA seems to advocate it's use with or without ENB Light. I've had it installed for months, and have not noticed anything funky ... but I have not been looking for ENB lighting effects explicitly to test this.
  6. z929669
    I don't have the time or inclination to check your math/logic The assessment rings true and is inherently logical, so I think this mod would be a nice addition with some modest nerfing to map ideally to vanilla (in which case I will need to look at the logic more closely). From your assessments from researching an using it, I am all the more interested in advocating it for myself and for Step
  7. z929669
    Yeah, I just updated all of my AFK mods. These all were updated but nothing else: I have added all AFK URLs to my applicable MO mods, because it's such a pain to find them on that site. I need to go through each section and look for anything familiar PS: I already checked CRF plugin against our DEV patches/plugins. Including Krypoto patch updates ... Everything is up to date in current DEV patches.
  8. z929669
    I added clarification to this. Please follow links and read through things before asking questions. I'd like to address anything that isn't explained or that is unclear only after you have verified yourself that you haveen't missed something by not reading or following a link. It takes time to read posts and answer questions
  9. z929669
    Thanks. Marked accepted for 2.1.0. I will create the mod page and add this one to the guide. It's been a while since I installed this, and I think it's just a straight up install with no fussing about.
  10. z929669
    Based on this post, I think we should be installing this just before USSEP in Foundation (although it can go later, since anything USSEP overrides from this mod is also overridden by another mod). This is the most 'proper' place for it it seems. Vote to make this change in 2.1.0 (and all guide, effectively, since changing ModGroup impacts all applicable guides)
  11. z929669
    I pretty much agree and am fine including this one, plume over mountains or not. @DoubleYou Is this a deal breaker for you?
  12. z929669
    Discussion topic: Majestic Mountains - More Accurate Collision by Korodic Wiki Link After checking things out, I have installed this in 06 just after S-AME Also install the optional S-AME patch
  13. z929669
    Ditto ... clearly, I have not looked at these mesh conflicts comprehensively, and I failed to load the texture path into NifSkope (duh) I think we should move this to Foundation then at lowest conflict priority and consider using the mod Mousetick linked. I will create that mod page and check it out.
  14. z929669
    Please read through the Grass LOD Guide if you haven't done so already. It basically explains how to do all of it (only can be done under 1.5.97 runtime).
  15. z929669
    Technically, a mountain range would obscure it at RL distance analogous to game world due to curvature of the Earth. If you were on top of the mountain range, you would see it though. That said: It IS a fantasy game ... but we DO always talk about 'realism' too, and all we have is our reality as a basis
  16. z929669
    Ahhh, OK. I agree. That's why I went with the preset we have. It is tweaked based on a review of several posts a while back. Did you test if the added INI file is necessary (i.e., code can be in enbseries.ini instead)?
  17. z929669
    Marked accepted. Just install in 06 in alphabetical order. The TexGen texture is in the WIP dev archive under 'core' of the FOMOD. So the OP instructions are unnecessary with the Step Patch installed. I think Phlunder made the Files page very confusing, and there is no explanation. What the heck are the Mountain LOD Meshes supposed to be doing in relation to DynDOLOD Resources for glaciers?? Apparently, they are revised LOD for vanilla mountains?? DynDOLOD Resources SE doesn't have most of them, but MM does, so I am very confused by this. I assume it relates to LE. If so, this mod should really be on an SSE Nexus page in a simpler format with clear instructions for both mods. Just sayin' Well, the sticky post sort of explains that the Mountain LOD meshes are the analog of the Glacier LOD Meshes but for vanilla mountains ... don't need them Created mod page and added to 2.1.0 guide.
  18. z929669
    There seems to be a misunderstanding. There is no 'mod' for grass collision. It's ENBSeries 0.473+ with EnableComplexGrassCollisions=true and a separate INI (enbgrasscollisions.ini) adjacent to enbseries.ini, the contents of which is customized for Step: [GRASSCOLLISIONS] Decay=30.0 FadeRandomization=0.6 Elasticity=2.0 Flexibility=0.9 ... this is a preset I configured based on feedback on the Nexus mod posts page. If you install the Step ENB, then this is what you get. Whether or not the above INI config works when placed directly into enbseries.ini (and deleting enbgrasscollisions.ini) is not clear. If it does and you guys have confirmed this, then we should not be using enbgrasscollisions.ini, and the config belongs in enbseries.ini. I have confirmed it works "as is" in the Step Heavy ENB in dev archive (no [GRASSCOLLISIONS] section in enbseries.ini).
  19. z929669
    Turn it off in ENB Effects settings via the enbseries.ini EnableComplexGrassCollisions=true
  20. z929669
    Yes, this is exactly how I have it set up. This way SLaWF overwrites all, since it's highest priority in LO.
  21. z929669
    I assume you mean that the collision config section can be in enbseries.ini as well. I had it there at first but wound up using the separate INI file, as I recall not getting it to work otherwise. So I removed it from enbseries.ini. I could be wrong though.
  22. z929669
    All good observations, but the reason I like it is that it changes learning from books to be taking effect over time of gameplay after reading a book rather than all at once in terms of leveling. With 'good' settings, this is more immersive and fluid, IMO. So I like this one out of the box but do see value in possibly tweaking the config a bit.
  23. z929669
    Any other takers for this one? I think it's an improvement, particularly given the TexGen texture findings. I have included it in my copy of the CR patch, and it works as expected.
  24. z929669
    What's the consensus on this one? I'm fine with adding it, but DY makes a valid point about the plume.
  25. z929669
    Anyone agree?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Use.

  I accept