MadWizard25 Posted May 6, 2012 Posted May 6, 2012 I will be testing out this mod + CCO + SPO + WAF to see if all are fully compatible. I think Weapons and Armour Fixes are included in the USKP, so not sure if it is necessary?
Neovalen Posted May 6, 2012 Posted May 6, 2012 I will be testing out this mod + CCO + SPO + WAF to see if all are fully compatible. I think Weapons and Armour Fixes are included in the USKP, so not sure if it is necessary? They are not all included. This has been verified in the comment thread for USKP and WAF.I still consider WAF a requirement for my build.
frihyland Posted May 6, 2012 Author Posted May 6, 2012 Yep there are hundreds of design changes in those mods that the USKP will never have, it only includes the bugfixes.
Neovalen Posted May 7, 2012 Posted May 7, 2012 Agreed Fri, however the USKP didn't include even some of the basic fixes such as: The duplicated "Circlet of Extreme Magicka" that is fixed with WAF but not with USKP. If you look at similar circlets by Bethesda you will see a pattern where Extreme/Eminent are the top two tiers of enchantment. WAF fixes the two "Circlet of Extreme Magicka" by renaming the stronger one "Circlet of Eminent Magicka" to match Bethesda's implementation of the others. I believe the reason it was not included in the USKP is because they consider this "improvement" rather than "fix" in the most strict sense of the word. I really wish things like this were included in USKP but I don't think it's going to happen.
Neovalen Posted August 17, 2012 Posted August 17, 2012 Ars Metallica has been updated with a Dawnguard patch.
DoYouEvenModBro Posted June 25, 2014 Posted June 25, 2014 Is it safe to update to the latest version of this mod? It was updated late March. I want to use the same savegame.
DoubleYou Posted June 25, 2014 Posted June 25, 2014 Generally Arthmoor makes entirely certain that it is safe to upgrade his mods.
GrantSP Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 I'm just browsing and I see this mod is labelled: 'dropped' but for the life of me I can't see the reasons expalined.Am I not looking in the right place?
hishutup Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 It was replaced with CCOR because it reduces plugins and whatnot
GrantSP Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 Well that makes sense, I myself prefer CCOR, but I can't see the documentation for this decision here.
TechAngel85 Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 Some of the mods that were dropped were done so in a Staff wiki discussion and voting with both Core and Extended. So some it will be documented that rather than on the threads. Here is the Core one: https://wiki.step-project.com/STEP:Core_ProposalHere is the Extended one: https://wiki.step-project.com/STEP:Extended_Proposal
GrantSP Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 Those links are very interesting, thank you.Can't seem to see where they link from though, are they just internal documentation not meant for general reading? If not I think having a link to to that would be very helpful.
TechAngel85 Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 You can find them searching on the forums but there is no specific link to them. They're in the STEP namespace so no one by Staff and edit them.
GrantSP Posted December 24, 2014 Posted December 24, 2014 Hmm... so users are to search for things that they didn't know existed! :O_o: That's fine, I'm only messing with you. I can look for those sort of things now I know they exist. Much appreciated.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now