TechAngel85

I had to return to the episodes of Wisdom Teachings where this was discussed. It's been a while since I've been into that information and I'm just going to quote from the episodes. David uses one source from Richard C. Hoagland titled "A New Model of Mars as a Former Captured Satellite: Bi-modal Distribution of Key Features Due to Ancient Tidal Stress". This is not a scientific source, but is based on some of Dr. Thomas Van Flandern's (PhD in Astronomy) unpopular in "mainstream science" works. Evidence to support that Mars was once a moon of Maldek, thus being destroyed by Maldek's own destruction includes: Mars is much less massive than any planet that is not already being suspected of being a former moon.The orbit of Mars is more elliptical than any other major planet.The spin of Mars is slower than larger planets, except where a massive moon's gravity has intervened.Mars possesses a large offset of center of figure from the center of mass. Meaning the heaviest part of Mars is not in the center of the planet which is what happens with moons captured in the gravity of a larger planet.The "crustal dichotomy" boundary is nearly a great circle which aligns with photo evidence that one half of the planet is fairly clear of craters vs the other half that has been completely blasted by asteroids. This aligns with what would happen if it was a moon of Maldek when it exploded. (Photo evidence is shown in the episode)Further on the point above is the northern hemisphere has a smooth, 1-km thick crust where the southern hemisphere has a 20-km thick crust. The crustal thickness in the south decreases gradually toward the crustal dichotomy boundary as would be seen in such a massive impact or multiple, near simultaneous impacts.Lobate scarps occur at the boundary divide compressed perpendicular to the boundary (which apparently happens during such impacts...I didn't bother looking it up)Xe129, a product of nuclear fission, has an excess abundance on Mars. (this one hit major news networks) What is interesting about this is the Law of One says that Maldek's destruction was a result of nuclear war.This was all me merely quoting the information from the episode... Well... Imagine that the Earth, as it is now, is the moon of a planet. This planet has a mass 81 times that of Earth (this is the Earth/Moon ratio for familiarity). BOOM! This planet explodes. Just what do you think would happen to the Earth? Massive chucks of that planet will be colliding with Earth at high velocities. This might not be enough to complete destroy Earth, but most of the atmosphere would likely have been blasted off along will most of the oceans vaporizing into space. The magnetic field would certainly change with such massive impacts as well. I would imagine that Earth would become a planet much like to Mars with such an event happening at such a close range. Or perhaps I simply have any overactive imagination. :: I'm not refuting anything. I simply said that I don't trust the numbers in the Law of One to their fullest extent and meant nothing more than that. To "refute" is to prove something wrong. You should consider law school because you are rather good at turning words around to mean something else out of context. No jabs here. I'm serious. You would likely make a good prosecutor if you like that sort of thing. But also seriously, don't put so much weight on my words. My vocabulary is not near good enough for me to hide my intentions in a well worded paragraph. I'm typically straightforward and say exactly what I mean. As for Ra's difficulty with our time/space you are missing a lot of information to completely grasp the concept, which would hopefully help you understand this a bit better. It's hard to fully discuss a book in a book club if you haven't read the book. With that said, it's actually difficult for me to fully explain without writing a book of my own... I will attempt to summarize. Ra is of the sixth density. They are not omniscient in any way. It would be no different than you or I once we reach that density. Ra explains contact with us telepathically is quite challenging and accurately interpreting our numbers such as dates is equally challenging. In fact, they explain that they searched for many years before being able to find a group of the correct configuration before they were able to even make the contact. To put it simply, anyone of a higher density greater than fourth would have a hard time communicating with us in such a way because of the requirements for contact which is to be able to match our vibrational level to an extent. The higher you go in density the harder it would become because the greater the change would have to be for the contact to happen. As for the numbers, I've already explained this a little, but you have to grasp time/space. In space/time we experience time by moving through space and only experience one space at a time. However, in time/space we could experience all of space at that same time. The past, the present, the future would all be available in what we currently experience as the present. Therefore, you might be able to imagine the difficulty of pinning down specific dates when all is one at at a single instance. Then there is the information that Ra experiences time very differently than we do so they are also having to interpret our "time". The language is, however, a result of the telepathic contact. They are able to use the channeler's mind as well as scan the mind of the other's present in the room to communicate. During the channeling, the channeler is putted out of their body and kept in a safe place and then Ra is able to use the mind and body of the channeler to speak. This is how Ra describes it. So imagine putting your consciousness into the developed mind of a foreigner. You would likely have access to all that foreigner knows, including their language. I only merely stated that, to Ra, all paradoxes have a solution. I'm not too keen on paradoxes myself. Ra will not break the Law of Free Will or the Law of Confusion. There are a ton of questions asked that Ra simply stated they won't answer because it would break these Laws for the ones present or for others that could potentially read the material. We're meant to figure things out on our own, not to be handed the keys. I can understand why. Even for something simple it could have large implications. For example, what if someone 10 years from the date the question was answered was suppose to come up with the answer themselves and that relation lead to other discoveries that defined the person's career, and eventually altered all of the world because from that one simple discovery it inspired that person to dig deeper to eventually discover the cure for all disease. This is an extreme example, but it makes the point that even the smallest of information can have profound effects. You should take most of this information that isn't scientific no differently than you would pages from the Bible. It's a book written by man from events that may or not be true and factual. It's up to you to decided what you believe. Wow... That is very interesting. It's the first time I've heard of something like that during mediation and is not what I was thinking of. Are you shifting your focus to the hallucination once you get a image of it or is it something that seems out of your control? Well, I can say that you certainly have the wrong impression of me. I'm not like what you explained at all. I actually quite humble. Though it's hard to get an accurate impression of anyone from just words on a page...which is why I don't do online dating. That was a great example of a personal jab, though. Thank you but I don't accept it as being valid for my life. Don't worry, I'm not going to give you a warning. Do note, however, that if you had said that to anyone else and the user reported you it would certainly be grounds for an "Impolite Post" warning that comes with 1 warning point attached. I, too, love the martial arts. I was a red belt in Tae Kwon Do as a kid and nearly a black belt in PaSaRyu Karate in my late teens. I had the honor of meeting Master Kang Rhee a couple of times. I still have a picture with him sitting in the closet somewhere. I absolutely loved PaSaRyu Karate as it was so much more advanced than Tae Kwon Do.

See the OP here for a list of requirements: https://forum.step-project.com/topic/9370-step-compilation/

Edit: Added a bit of info

You should try to push past this stage. Many people do as you do and stop when they reach here because they allow fear to creep in; however, if you can push yourself past this there are deeper/higher levels to discover. I am curious as the to nature of your hallucinations. When I mediate deeply I often feel as though I stop breathing and am snapped out of the deeper mediation. This is an odd sensation as I never really stopped breathing. I'm of the opinion the spirit or higher self is probably one of the best options for judging information. You see, I've very spiritually minded these days. This third density experience is just one of many and there are so many things that simply do not matter in the grand scheme of things. Usually when I test things in this manner and receive a result that is "inconclusive", meaning I didn't really get a result, I view it as something that simply doesn't matter. At that point I would make the decision based on my head knowledge. But you are correct, there is no way of validating the validity of the information received until it takes place to be proven or disproven by reality. Keep in mind that Ra has trouble with our words, especially when it comes to numbers. Because of this, I don't view any of the numbers in the Law of One material as being 100% sound information. There are multiple instance where Ra states this and corrects previous information. On the website you have used this can been seen in 16:35 and 17:0. In 16:35 the term galaxy is the point of confusion as Ra uses this term for our local solar system as well as for the Milky Way. To them, there is no difference but size. In 17:0 Ra corrects information dealing with years where they were 1000 years off stating that they have difficulty with our time/space when getting this information. They state this again, in 17:29 when dealing with a date. Therefore, I take all information dealing with dates and numbers in the material to be an approximation. Not a sound fact. With that said, I'm not sure where your math is coming from and I'm not quite following it. I haven't been in college in years and calculators are my best friends. :: I'm glad to speak of this and the next quote below. First, Ra speaks many times that there are no real paradoxes. All paradoxes as we see them have a solution: "We offer the Law of One, the solving of paradoxes, the balancing of love/light and light/love.""In our vibration the polarities are harmonized, the complexities are simplified, and the paradoxes have their solution. We are one. That is our nature and our purpose."Second, I would have to go back to review the episodes but David Wilcock makes some compelling arguments that the Drake Equation is completely off, if not completely wrong. However, with that said, I believe his couple episodes on this was before the Drake Equation was updated in 2016. Now to speak of the Confederation of Planets, the one spoken of in the Law of One contains 500 planets which serves the callings of only 7 solar systems. These 500 planets are not likely within the 7 systems. Ra states that there are many confederations which serve various systems. To put this into perspective of why so many planets sever so few systems we can take some information elsewhere that states there are approximately 635 million individuals on our planet alone (in early 1980s so this number has likely increased with population) which are calling upon the services of the Confederation. We can take the lowest assumption that there is only one planet in each system calling and that would be 4.445 billion individuals calling all at once. This is likely a low estimate. Therefore, you might be able to see why so many are only able to serve so few as I'm sure not every individual on these Confederation planets will be doing this service. Our local branch, for lack of better wording, of the Confederation is called the Council of Saturn. This council's purpose is the protection of the third-density processes which take place on Earth and the uploading of the Law of One. Ra explains this council has 9 ruling members and 24 entities, called Guardians, which offer their service to the council. 7:9 explains most of this. Here is where the information gets interesting. They weren't humans, they were of another species of humanoids. There is a lot of history here in the Law of One concerning this spanning many sessions. It would take a lot of typing to explain it all. To summarize the end, these "Martians" were reincarnated on Earth after the destruction of the planet which was caused by the explosion of Maldek. There is scientific data that supports the theory of one side of the planet being blasted by giant asteroids as would be seen in a nearby planetary explosion pellet bombing Mars, thus striping Mars of it's atmosphere and altering its magnetic field. The other side of that is the striping of the atmosphere was done by solar winds from the Sun, but this doesn't hold up well when all the other planets still have their atmospheres intact. Without getting into conspiracy theory, there might very well be proof, but we haven't sent any archeologist to Mars have we? In fact, the only things we have of Mars are some nice pictures from rovers and satellites and some scientific data from these instruments. It's interesting that NASA has announced water on Mars, though [1], [2]. That would be one step toward proving that there could have been life present at one time...or there still is and we simply haven't found it yet.

Yes, it is by an act of their will which causes them to become a ghost. They still have the mind and consciousness as they did when they were alive. That is my understanding. I don't think the Law of One ever talks about premonitions. If I had to guess, I would guess that a guiding entity showed her this image. The Law of One does talk about guiding entities. These are both our higher selves and part of our soul groups which haven't incarnated but chose to aid us in our current incarnation. "Guardian angels", if you will. The other possibility is as you say. She was able to use her consciousness to reach into time/space and gleam the possibility of the event. Her mind was likely only able to interpret the information she gleamed as she did with the vision. Sorry, I've never watched Doctor Who. But a wormhole transports matter through time/space to another space/time. This would be like leaving your body behind, traveling to Paris in your mind, and then willing your body to be placed there. If you've ever seen the movie "Jumper" with Hayden Christensen, it would be like that. Think of a place and boom, you're there. You're saying that energy could get "stuck" in a "stasis" state? Basically it's not doing anything but sitting there? Or are we talking about ghosts/spirits becoming "stuck" and not being able to move on?

Okay...so...wow...that's a lot of text. I'll attempt to hit on some notes and answer any direct questions before providing an over reply to mainly Mono and Baron. @Mono Psychologist? English teacher? If not, you sure could fool me! Haha! You are correct. I would say this is condition as most of those that I have spoken to about this type of information respond in a judgmental manner. The quotes were just for fun. I know little to nothing about the individuals themselves with the exception of Jesus. I meant nothing of the sort when I said that and will address this further later on. I take it that you have never deeply meditated and received information that you know within your very being to be true to only have it completely validated later on? I have and I have no explanation for this other than the higher self providing this knowledge through the meditation. I honestly have no words to explain this accurately. It's as if I take in the information and present it to my spirit and from there I know if the information is good, bad, or inconclusive. I have done this for over ten years now and it has rarely let me down. Sometimes my thoughts do creep in and seed doubt, but 9/10 times if I simply trust my spirit then I'm not steered wrong. I have no explanation for how it works or word to explain the feeling. It just something I started doing around the age of 18 (I'm 31 now) and have honed it ever since. I guess you could say that in a way, it's extremely honed intuition, but it feels greater than that. Thank you for the clarification and as I said, I hold no grudges or hard feelings. Though I will point out, as others have attempted to do, that your approach attached with your wording comes off as such. I also agree that this only holds baring on myself as other might wish to view me from revealing this information. Personally, I couldn't care less what others think about me. I'm not that kind of person. I'm extremely independent and need no approvals from anyone on my character. If someone doesn't like me, then so be it. It's a very large world filled with all sorts of people and there just so happens to be plenty of space; we're not required to interact and maintain the same space. Though, I will say that I would view those people as judgmental and likely intolerant. I will address this very simply below, but I will say that you make a good point. Yes. Yes, I've read quite a bit of material that contradicts and has alternative views. Possibly, but I have yet to discover any. This would be something personal which would differ from person to person, but on the possibility alone...Yes, it's certainly possible. I will answer by saying much of what an individual interprets will be based on that individual's own mindset and the way he/she thinks, therefore, two separate individuals could provide two separate interpretations. The thing is, when we are talking about the spiritual neither interpretations are necessarily wrong. I took no offense to your postings and have no idea where you guys are interpreting that I'm uneasy with the the science or your views of the material. I'm not. If anything, I was frustrated from the science part because that wasn't why I started this conversation. More on this at the end of this post. I have to say that I find that article a little ridiculous and I love space stuff. First, they're making their "guess" based off the study of a single star. One star??? Second, the entire article is filled with words and phrases like "should", "points towards", " perhaps", etc. meaning they don't really know; it's just a guess. Third, the idea of the Kepler telescope has always been ify with me. They think they're finding planets, but the magnitude of what we don't know about space far outweighs what we do know. And what we do know changes every few years when we discover something new that we didn't know. Ya know? :: Point being is they could be looking at just about anything that is between here and that star 900+ light years away which could cause a repeating pattern when the light from that star has traveled the distance it has. For all we know if there was a plant and that star could have swallowed it up by now or been destroyed by a cosmic event. 100 Billion seems to be a common theme. A quick search on NASA revealed they're estimating there are 100 billion stars in the Milky Way, 100 billion galaxies in the observable universe, and now we have 100 billion planets. The real answer here is, "we don't know". Unfortunately, that is the real answer for much of talks around space subjects. @ All Now it would seem that my words are being psychoanalyzed and being read WAY more into then they should be. Therefore, the best way I know to reply to everything I didn't specifically address is with this image: [spoiler=Potentially NSFW (swear word)] My final closing thoughts are that you all have good points. It took Mono's explanation for me to realize that regardless whether or not I wanted this discussion to be about the material or about the science behind the material, some of the material does, in fact, warrant science getting involved. Therefore when such a subject comes up that warrants it, I welcome any scientific prodding on the material. I will attempt to reply the best I can, but no promises because a lot of my scientific beliefs are on the fringes as well so I expect them to be ridiculed.

It's wasn't so much you as it was Mator who was making some personal jabs at the content which reflects back onto the people who have specific belief systems. I hold no hard feelings or grudges, though. Let me answer this for both you and Mono, but you've answered your own question in a way. First understand that this is not science. It's a belief system akin to religion (but not a religion) where science can not prove nor disprove the mast majority of the information unless you look to the fringe sciences which most scientific minds write off. This has been well discussed already. Mainstream science simply is not advanced enough at this point in time to provide accurate data on the information anymore it can tell us whether or not the miracles God and Jesus performed where true or not. Hence why I would prefer to leave science out of it because it just becomes a "he said, she said" dueling match. Questioning someone's beliefs should be done on your own time in your own space. As I said, you don't know that person's life story which led them to their belief structures. If you're curious, then ask them questions in a positive light to try to understand their beliefs. However, attempting to tear down someone's beliefs will almost always in end negative feelings and emotions because you're not just attempting to tear down the information you received. You're also tearing down and telling that person that their experiences in life that led to those beliefs were wrong. You can not separate one from the other because true beliefs are rooted in experiences. Who are you to judge the experiences of another person? I will post a few of my favorite quotes about judgement for your entertainment pleasure: "Judge not, that you be not judged. For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you." -Jesus"We can never judge the lives of others, because each person knows only their own pain and renunciation.” -Paulo Coelho"It's not given to people to judge what's right or wrong. People have eternally been mistaken and will be mistaken, and in nothing more than in what they consider right and wrong.” -Leo Tolstoy"When you judge others, you do not define them, you define yourself” -Earl Nightingale "Don't judge a man by his opinions, but what his opinions have made of him.” -Georg LichtenbergI digress... With that said, I believe is it healthy and necessary for one to question their own beliefs. Without doing this there is no growth as you have mentioned. However, it's not our place as individuals to question another person's beliefs because true beliefs are those things and ideas that align to an individual's own spirit; their sense of right or wrong, appropriate or inappropriate. Only the individual holding the beliefs can truly question the beliefs because they are the one that had the experiences which founded those beliefs. The one thing that seemed to be skipped over and ignored is my saying that I have already completed this process for myself. It's not anyone's place to try to get anyone else to question their personal beliefs. Sure, offer another view point, but without tearing at their the other person's beliefs by making it a "you're wrong, I'm right" match. I have already had the experiences, read the information, tested the information within my own spirit, and aligned my beliefs where I felt appropriate to my personal walk in life. I have been sitting on this stuff for months (nearly a year now), and other personal beliefs that align with the material I've had for many, many years now before find the material. I don't need to have all the flaws with how it conflicts with conventional science pointed out because I already know this. This gets to your next comments.... Yes, that is the point of the discussion. As I've said above, I've completed the process of testing the information for my own personal beliefs and need no confirmation. I am sound in my assessments for my personal experience and, thus, no longer require to question the material. Thus, that was not supposed to be the purpose of the topic. If anyone else needs to stack the material up against your own personal life experience for your own assessment, then I encourage them do so but know in doing so is a personal experience between you and your spirit (I would suggest to actually read the material and not just go off of what has been posted here before doing so). I'm perfectly willing to listen to anyone's views, else I wouldn't have replied to any of the science related posts. However, don't expect me to be willing to bend on my own personal views when I've already completed my personal assessment and refined my beliefs over many months of inwardly searching. As I go back and read, this is my own fault for not being more clear in the opening post on the direction I wished the topic to take. I'd like to point out that I wasn't the one that brought science into the discussion. I merely responded. Unlike many, and there's nothing wrong with those that choose to do so, I rarely base my beliefs on what is provable by science. So the whole "using pseudo-science to confirm" does not register in my case. In my own life experiences I've found that trusting my own intuition and testing things against my spirit has been far more enlightening and accurate for me, personally. If I only listened to science, I wouldn't believe in anything of a spiritual nature: ghosts, life after death, a higher power, etc. My personal belief of what's wrong with the world is there is too much outwardly seeking and not enough inwardly seeking. In older times we balanced mixing sciences with the spiritual. This eventually shifted to "all head, all thought" and we stopped truly seeking the spiritual aspects of life. Now we seek what can only be explained through science and reject or put to the side anything that can't be explained. To quote one of my favorite movies, "…too many mind. Mind the sword, mind the people watch, mind the enemy, too many mind. No mind." When we let go of our minds, our thoughts, and find a place of calm mind it is in that place where we find our true selves. Not who the world says we are or should or shouldn't be. Another one of the core principles to most religions is that in order to help others, you must first help yourself. We all believe we have the answers and that those answers are the right answers, but what is right for yourself may not be right for everyone or anyone else. So before we can help others, we must first look inward, come to know our demons, resolve them, and seek the person that we truly are. "And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye?" There's a hundred different ways of saying this same thing, but they all say to look inward before looking outward. Most of the world today reverses this concept. They take what they find outwardly and project it to who they think they are or want to be inwardly. I believe if this is reserved back, then we would not project ourselves and our beliefs onto others because they would be our personal inwardly beliefs; not what we discovered out in the world. We would then be sound in our differences and be accepting of those differences without the need for conflict. Instead of projecting what we received from the world back into it which is intolerance, fear, uncertainty, negative emotions, and so much more we would start projecting the true emotions from within us into the world which are hope, love, and unity. This would change the world as we know it. The world doesn't need more of what it is giving us project back into it. It needs acceptance, forgiveness, loving others, and servicing others without the expectation of return. Doing these things will naturally produce a better world. Of course, this is all just how I see things from my own prospective.

Yeah, I'm on an SSD so I generally see the ENB message in-game too and not just on the loading screens. I go in and out of the game for mod testing and development so much that my brain tends to filter out those messages up there. I forget such things can be annoying for regular players. ::

No alienation, but at the same time I don't understand the reason you (and others) feel the need to basically attack another's beliefs simply because you don't believe the same. Attack probably isn't the best word to use here, but I don't have the vocabulary to come up with anything else at the end of what was a very long day. The entire first page of this discussion was nothing but a bash on the material, a bash on my beliefs, and, in your own words, a questioning of my beliefs. Feeling the need to question someone's beliefs is probably one of the worse things to do it a person, in my book. You don't know their life experiences nor their personal story to know what shaped them into the person they are. Nor have you walked in their shoes for you to be able to understand how that person arrived at their beliefs. One thing I never consciously do is question someone's beliefs. If anything, I ask questions to understand because I am honestly curious to know how they arrived at their beliefs. For example, it's most fascinating to me how you believe in God or a higher power, but don't believe in ghosts. This is because in my mind the process of believing in one is nearly identical as believing in the other. That is why I asked about it. However, what I felt like I received on that first page and even now is intolerance. I want to point out that none of this was said out of anger so please don't read it in such a tone. I'm simply being honest. I'm actually quite tired and ready of bed, but I wished for you to know how I view your version of discussing in this topic. To me it wasn't discussion. It as attack and defense. Though, as I said in an earlier post, I was kinda of expecting it and was just wanting to get past it. That sort of thing always happen with these types of discussions on the internet regardless of where they're started. The point of this topic (philosophical might not have been the best wording) was to discuss the material in a sense "if it were true how would it all work, how would life be for us, how would we evolve as humans along this path, how would we connect with one another on deeper levels, etc and so on". But to have that sort of discussion you have to work on the basis that it is true. That doesn't mean believing it is true, but rather simply imagining it being true. As I mentioned before, it's rather simple to do as the majority of my college classmates were able to do it without attacking the information itself. SparrowPrince has been doing rather well with his line of questioning. However, in this regard I've sort of become the professor filling in the holes rather than one of the "discussees", but that's okay. ::

Well it's not really as simple as "BAM"...reincarnated. For the young souls, who are not aware of the process of spiritual growth after death, the..."caretakers" (a term I'm just using) are the one that process your life experience, help to set up your next incarnation, and the decide the catalysts that will be used for teaching in that incarnation. The way the Law of One explains ghosts leads me to believe it's more of an out-of-body experience. Though the yellow-ray body dies it can not be "deactivated" due to the extreme will of the entity, is how Ra describes it. Basically the body dies, but the yellow-ray mind and spirit remains. Yellow-ray is just our current density (third). That's a beautiful story and I would say that your great-aunt met one of the "caretakers" who operate under the Guardians. These are the entities in the quoted text: "Firstly, there are those directly under the Guardians who are responsible for the incarnation patterns of those incarnating automatically, that is, without conscious self-awareness of the process of spiritual evolution. You may call these beings angelic if you prefer. They are, shall we say, “local” or of your planetary sphere." Another interesting thing that Law of One briefly talks about is that astral projection, for entities of higher density, can be used as a form of advanced travel. Basically it's described that you project your mind and spirit to a location and through the will of your consciousness you can teleport your body to that location in an instant. This form of travel is used by Ra. No, not Darwin evolution. It's an evolution of consciousness. Graduating from density to density is more of a graduation of consciousness than that of body. This is an ability of those of fifth density according to the Law of One material. This means we would still have to finish this third density and complete the forth until we would have such abilities of consciousness to reach into time/space with ease. My understanding is that it is recycled and that energy is never truly depleted. It's only transformed and recycled. As it is "depleted" to our eyes and understanding it simply moves from space/time into time/space. This process of energy transfer can also happen from time/space into space/time. Therefore, it is simply transferred back and forth. As for recycling think of heating a pot of water on the electric stove. The electricity is generated by the water of a dam. This electricity heats the coils on the stove. The heat energy from the coils boils the water. The water turns into steam vapor in the air. A few molecules of that vapor eventually condenses into rain which fills the lake that powers the dam. The energy is simply recycled. Therefore energy is simply recycled or transferred. This is getting more into sciences since the Law of One doesn't really talk about this much. My views on energy are a bit of the edge of modern science and could be considered esoteric vs the common views.

Sorry about that. I've removed the FOMOD instructions. Just install the No JIT version.

The WATER Plants in The Ruffled Feature don't do anything but that. The frogs are found around the lily pads on one or two locations around Lake Ilinalta. Moss on rocks is from Moss Rocks, not WATER. Now if you have the older version of The Ruffled Feather, it did have the mod "WATER" in it. That mod overhauls all the waters and most water effects.

So I had to run over to the FO creation kit page to find this: I'm still not sure how angles covert to how much of the material is covered...shouldn't that be percentage?

Can anyone tell me what the "DNAM - Direction Material" records are and what they're used for? I'm specifically interested in the "Max Angle" record and its purpose/use. For example it is used while applying the snow shader to objects and different object have different angle values. I can't seem to find any information on what this record/value actually does though.

Fixed.

That was it. I was running TAA and that is why I didn't see it. Unfortunately, the only thing you and test is the same tweaks that were for classic Skyrim. It's something that is baked into the engine. If it hasn't been fixed in over 5 years for classic Skyrim I seriously doubt it's going to be fixed in SSE. Bethesda is just about done with updating SSE, by the looks of it. There's a multitude of bugs that remain which could be fixed. You can try the old tweaks which were this: Keep in mind that altering your FOV will affect the settings. EDIT: Grammar...

All of yuril's mods have been removed from Nexus. You can only get it from the STEP Compilation now. We have permission to use it.

I just tested with in several locations while forcing clear weather (81a). The only place I ever seen z-fighting was around the water regions and there were only a couple. Water has always done this in Skyrim, though. I found one single instance of z-fight on a mountain from the Throat of the World looking towards Riften. That is the only instance involving a mountain I could find. I will say that it has virtually been eliminated in regards to mountains in SSE and if you're experiencing it, it's most likely an INI setting, mod, or mod conflict causing the issue. I had Nordic Snow installed during my testing and it didn't cause any problems. Also of note is I am not using DynDOLOD in SSE. Yes, it's common knowledge that increasing your FOV too high will cause z-fighting to worsen (at least it does in classic Skyrim). Altering fNearDistanceXXX will also affect z-fighting.

Okay... The script from Lock Overhaul appears to be using a formlist to determine if a crime is being committed. This formlist contains specific factions for the various holds (no animal or creature factions). Within these factions are listed members of those faction which are various NPCs. Therefore, if I'm reading the script correctly, it is only determining if the player is committing a crime against the NPCs listed within the factions in the formlist. Meaning animals should not report the crimes. NARC specifically edits the individual factions themselves to tell those factions to ignore crimes. These are only the animal and creature factions. No NPC factions are touched. I can not be certain if animals and creatures would still report crimes or not with just Lock Overhaul installed. It certainly appears that the script from Lock Overhaul will only trigger crimes if one of the specified NPCs are within the crime distance. An in-game test is needed to determine what the outcome is to be 100% certain, but the mod page for Lock Overhaul says crimes will not longer be reported by animals and creatures. Unfortunately, after an hour and testing and trying. I wasn't able to set up a good, repeatable test to determine if Lock Overhaul's script is working as advertised. It see no reason why it wouldn't be though. This means that NARC is likely redundant.

It's a simple process to do via scripts. Basically you just switch out a model during a specific time of day. There is also a mod that has NPCs that walk around lighting the candles that LoS adds. However, we found it to be a bit buggy.

Some do automatically reincarnate without consciously being involved in the process. The quoted material covers this. The younger spirits/souls/consciousness are not aware of the spiritual growth process and these are automatically reincarnated under the guidance of entities serving directly under the Guardians discussed earlier. They do this service of their own free will and it is a great service. Young souls here are usually of the third density groups. After graduation through the densities, the individual will become aware of the spiritual growth process after death and will choose its own future lessons to learn before reincarnating. During incarnation, there is a process of "forgetting" that is necessary. Without this process we would know all there is to know and would learn nothing in the incarntive state of being. The Law of One does say it is possible to pierce the veil of this forgetting process to become aware of the catalyst that are at work in your life. This can be done through mediation and seeking to know one's true self. People get "stuck", according to the Law of One, usually due to a tragic or unexpected death and they do not realize they are dead. Free will plays a major part in this. Usually during death an entity will freely move on because this is the natural process. However, during unexpected deaths, some entities will have a strong enough desire to keep living and experiencing and thus their will overcomes the death process. The only other way ghosts can occur is the dead entity has an extreme concern for a thing or an other person which is strong enough to overcome the death process. As for existing in both space/time and time/space, yes. This is very true for everyone. We simply are not, for lack of a better word, "evolved" enough to utilize anything in time/space during our current incarnations. The Law of One speaks of entities who are of the fifth density that can do this freely. Yes, reincarnation of a being is unlimited until that being becomes one with the Creator in the seventh density. You would never become stuck in a single stage. Ra explains it rather poetically (paraphrasing here): "As the plant instinctively grows towards the light, so do we instinctively grow towards the Creator." It might take longer for some entities, but we all eventually move through the densities and become one with the Creator again. Energy is infinite and never runs out from my understanding of the material and of the science I've seen on the subject. It passes between space/time and time/space in a loop. Think torus.

It would be a trivial thing for the author to fix and would likely only take a couple of minutes of work. It's just a matter of removing the debug message in the script.

Yes, that "issue" is not an issue. It's just how the mod works. The candle flames do not go out. The braziers are vanilla. That just how the game was designed. That sounds like a mod that would be something for you. It should be fine to install with STEP.

There's no direct conflicts. It does look like Lock Overhaul is doing something in the scripts dealing with crime, but I would have to decompile the scripts to be able to see what it's doing. NARC does this by editing the factions.

I've tested lepidoptera a bit and found some of the textures to be over saturated.