Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Vertical lines look like banding artifacts... if it is not normal related then it would be because you got some serious compression artifacts on your color map... or are working from a file that was compressed ie you lost a lot of color information during that transition. 

Posted

It's present in some but not all options so it's not the diffuse map (skin) and since it's not present with all options it can only be the normal maps. When I re-saved them after fixing that issue in the blue channel, I saved with with the Nvidia Tool as DXT1.

 

EDIT:

That's the culpret. It's the normal after it's been re-saved. The artifacting is visible when zoomed in and and especially when only viewing the blue channel. Any suggestions on this since all I have to work with atm is the Nvidia Tool which is causing the issue?

 

EDIT:

This is the issue in the normals that needs to be fixed and the reason for the re-save.

Posted Image

Posted

You NEVER want to save a normal map with DXT1... min would be DXT5.. and while you are working with it leave it uncompressed so you are certain that no compression artifacts sneak along. It is perfectly fine to have a 2k uncompressed normal map for skin textures as well in release too imo. It is one texture that is always loaded, and every single compression artifact will most likely be visible. Especially the body one, since it does need to cover a rather large area relative to how well the UV´s cover the texture. 

 

 

Also... for normals.. crazybump is one way to do it.. xnormal another. I use a small prog called InsaneBump which is a very very light weight version of what Crazybump does.. Normally I combine the Nvidia one with that since the Nvidia one cannot generate Large enough depth on its own, but I find it better as a general base. 

Dunno if that process would work for skin since I never worked with that specifically. 

Posted

Without supplying technical info, which I don't know. They look good, really good! You did a great job of getting the glossy skin off, and they are well detailed. Really liked the Most tone More Abs, and agree that they do look really good on orcs. Aside from seeing what you already knew and what Aiyen has already brought up, the vertical shadow lines. I like them and think they will only get better.

Posted

You NEVER want to save a normal map with DXT1... min would be DXT5.. and while you are working with it leave it uncompressed so you are certain that no compression artifacts sneak along. It is perfectly fine to have a 2k uncompressed normal map for skin textures as well in release too imo. It is one texture that is always loaded, and every single compression artifact will most likely be visible. Especially the body one, since it does need to cover a rather large area relative to how well the UV´s cover the texture. 

 

 

Also... for normals.. crazybump is one way to do it.. xnormal another. I use a small prog called InsaneBump which is a very very light weight version of what Crazybump does.. Normally I combine the Nvidia one with that since the Nvidia one cannot generate Large enough depth on its own, but I find it better as a general base. 

Dunno if that process would work for skin since I never worked with that specifically. 

I have to do it in Photoshop because of having to edit the file. CrazyBump doesn't allow editing (the kind I need) from what I've seen of it. It's good for creating normals; however, I'm not creating them but rather simply editing/fixing them. I've tried a very wide range of settings for DXT1 and DXT5; however, none of them will save the file in the same quality as the originals. Time to PM the author.

Posted

There is no alpha channels for anything yet so I went with 888. The skin texture itself; however, is saved in DXT1. It's not detailed enough that you can tell a difference when loaded side by side. I checked once I figured out this compressed vs uncompressed thing.

Posted

Good you got it sorted out... was gonna say it would be a bit weird if you could not save as you wanted... the GIMP version allows that then I am fairly certain the photoshop would as well! 

 

Anyways... looking good so far. Will have to do a more indepth test later...atm I am kind of on a roll with some other development, and do not want to slow down! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Use.