z929669

People can still get the gist from others, not to mention the fickle nature of so many humans. I'd prefer not to see a mysteriously-changing result for every poll.

Changing votes is not allowed, and that will not change ... "group think" will not take over any of the polls around here ;) just be careful next time ... I will consider your input though and make a mental note. it should not matter once we have more voting

I knew I couldn't be alone in disliking 20+ ;) If we get at least 10 more people expressing a preference, that would at least be a fair sample, albeit still totally inadequate. I'll post a poll up top.

OK, Just waiting for someone to object to the current 15 ....

I had already set up "tag categories", which appear in the thread label at the very top thread view.

This topic is resolved, Post merging is a new topic ;)

Hit the litlle icon just to left of thread title in the thread-list view ;) For topics with new content, this is a shortcut to 'first unread post (hover over that icon). The reason the within-thread menu option is not available on some (top right), is because they are only a single page long. I suppose the logic is that you should not be that lazy :P (since you are already drilled into the thread ... but the method above always works with new posts)

Please separate all of your requests into different posts, and please make them brief. This will allow me to give each request attention. You have at least three requests in there (post limit/page, post limit/thread, save draft). use Tapatalk. RE post/page limit, only a handful of people expressed any opinion at all out of more than 3500. EssArrBee and Nearox stated a preference for 15 or 20, Phazer only said 15 was 'wierd'. Only you and JareX have a strong opinion for 20 (or more). This difference is not even a candidate for determination of a real difference. Also, s4n has not chimed in, and his vote has more weight, since he is the backend server admin and webmaster #1. There may be other considerations. I will go back to 20 or even more if that is truly the consensus, but we need more opinions first. More does allow more efficient word search by page. I doubt we will ever have a post limit, unless it becomes a Dbase issue. Check DDSopt and SR threads. they are huge, so if they are performing adequately, then no worries.

Glad it was so easy to find a fix on Google :P Glad it worked, and glad to see another Firefox convert. It really is the most stable, bug free, code-compatible, and feature-rich browser IMHO.

Looks good now. The above is a test account I just made and pasted using Ctrl + v and again using context menu. Fouled comments are also removed.

IE Users: I implemented a hack to fix this. Please post back if these issues are resolved

IE has security options that are a PITA to deal with. I hate that browser in most ways, but it would be nice to verify the settings, so I'll take a look.

OK that seems to be the behavior I expect. new content with respect to new 'profile' content versus the default being topic content just about from anywhere else. Not a bug or even unexpected, IMO.

Could you post a screen? I see not what you mean o_O ... also, are you active on XDA forums for the Samsung Galaxy? Someone over there uses the same Avatar ...

Raised posts to 15/page

Woops, I goofed good eh? ... I see what I did now :P Take a look again ;)

15 is a fair compromise then. May increase back to 20 later

I was looking for the .post_ignore. I'll fix this evening and look at that recent posts solution too. EDIT: applied a fix just now. disable your hack and let me know what it looks like if you please :)

Previous forums had a 10 posts/page limit too. This is globally configurble. I recently reduced it from 20, since I found it tedious to scroll so far on every page. Perhaps we could compromise at 15?

Over at MyBB boards before we moved to IP Board forums, we had a post/page limit of 10 posts per page. When we moved over to IP Board, this was increased to 20 for about a week and then decreased down to 10 for a few days. Finally, the limit was again increased, but this time up to 15 as a compromise. Having more posts per page allows for more efficiant word searching per page load and it also reults in fewer pages in the topic breadcrumb. However, more posts per page also increases the vertical scrolling 'burden', since the vertical length of each topic page can get quite long, depending on post content. Too many posts also increases page load times, especially on threads with lots of media content (which is pretty common on these forums). Original post by JareX Hi, when the forum format was changed there were a nice number of post per page (20 I think) I find annoying to dive into long threads with a lot of pages, and I personally like to have more post per page. (this is my personal opinion thou) So I woul like to know if there is any way to increase this on the settings (couldn't find an option) If it's not possible to change that only for me, I would like to know the community opinion how this topic, and if they like the way it is or the would like to see more post per page. thanks for this great community (I'm actually having more fun modding skyrim than playing the game o.O )

I have always found xTernalEditor to be clunky and potentially life killing. I recall several time doing large edits that required 30 minutes or more and losing my session and all of my edits. I will not missit, as I don't think it ever worked seamlessly enough. I agree with tech that a simple workaround is to manually use an external editor. one problem I have seen is the addition of line breaks at every n after pasting manually. Visual Editor development is still progressing though. We may even have it by 2015. Flow is another one that looks nice.

Could you share the override you used? That will save me the hassle of reproducing to track it down. Also, if you notice any similar issues related to ignored users, please let us know and share the fix ;) So you are saying that MyBB used to exclude posts from ignored members on the new post list for each member? I'll look and see if there is a setting for that, but no promises.

TBD, but not a priority right now.

What is the 'fix', and what is the cause?

Is there a way to identify or should we make this more prominent for those that may be impacted? Also, how should one go about verifying whether this issue applies to them or not?