Jump to content

rpsgc

Mod Author
  • Posts

    624
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rpsgc

  1. Langley updated the tents: And Nord/fur tent done:
  2. Doesn't Skyrim Flora Overhaul already do that?
  3. It is. https://wiki.step-project.com/STEP:2.2.2#2.I._Clothing_.26_Equipment
  4. The more I look at it the more I think: "How is that better than vanilla textures with the HR-DLC?". I'm serious.
  5. If you're expecting smarter AI (better tactics, no rushing, use of flanking, etc), don't hold your breath. Putting aside the fact that the game is more than 1 year old, this is Bethesda we're talking about.
  6. I just use the 'Perfect Legionnaire 4-0 - Proper Gloves and Gauntlets FIXED' file to have gloves on the Imperial bracers.
  7. Interior fog removal from Hearthfire homes wasn't forgotten, right?
  8. I don't understand where people get this idea that making a skill legendary is mandatory :|
  9. Since the last downtime, I haven't received any new reply notification e-mails for any of the threads I'm subscribed to. Is anyone else having the same problem?
  10. Too noisy/grainy/too much static or whatever you want to call it. Rubs me the wrong way. Langley uploaded an Imperial tent optional file today. Don't know if it's any good though https://skyrim.nexusmods.com/mods/26269
  11. They all look too "noisy" to me. Like they're full of static. I can't really explain.
  12. Meh, I'll pass. What can I say? His retextures just don't feel right, I don't like them.
  13. Vanilla HD/HR is perfectly fine.
  14. I tried it a while back. Too gaudy for my taste. I'll stick with the vanilla HR textures.
  15. To be fair, RLO is still far from finished. You should try 4.0.7 when it's out. https://skyrim.nexusmods.com/articles/973/
  16. Reaching higher levels without having to use/increase useless or unwanted skills. Getting as many perk points as you want while keeping your specialization. That is what it is.
  17. If there are any, I'm sure they'll show up here https://forums.bethsoft.com/topic/1447552-holy-crap-patch-19/
  18. Oh. I haven't been around to observe their patterns for a while. Pity - I was quite excited when I saw that!It's always there but that doesn't mean it's not true.
  19. You should fix that formatting :P
  20. 'Basic' version added. Doesn't add new trees, diverse trees or hand-placed plants - same as previous versions. Only one .esp - same as previous versions. Seems more suitable for STEP.
  21. No punching trees = no buy :ox:
  22. A few people? Those were just quotes from the last two pages from people with that problem, never mind the ones with save game corruption or the mod not working at all or any other problem from the remaining 140+ pages. And what if it's only a few people there? You're fine with hundreds or thousands of STEP users experiencing these problems? These aren't harmless bugs. But I just love how your answer to those problems is "I don't care because more people say good things". 1-5%? Because you counted them all right? And those aren't 'negative' posts. A negative post is saying the mod sucks. Saying it's not working or that it's bugging out is not a negative post. You call them 'negative' posts just to dismiss them and remove their validity. Feel free to point out a STEP mod that: Causes save game corruption when removing/uninstalling even when following the author's instructions to the letter;Causes save game bloat (which it did until the last version' date=' and it's still not 100% confirmed to be fixed);Doesn't work at all for some people;Bugs out for no reason and doesn't stop;Keeps doing certain actions after disabling the relevant options. Because it's completely inconceivable that: Those people stopped using the mod before noticing problems or before the newer versions of the mod introduced those problems?Those people didn't bother to remove the endorsements?Those people chose to ignore the issues for whatever reason?Those people didn't even notice the issues/problems because... (see below)Those people did like the majority of the Nexus users and just blind endorsed a mod based on how good it "looks", sometimes without even using it or testing it?You think just because a mod has a lot of endorsements it automatically means it's good and safe? You think people actually test mods before praising them?How many endorsements did Sounds of Skyrim get before being pulled down because it caused save game bloat and other problems? I've said what I had to say.
  23. Have you tried the 'coc' command? It worked for me.
  24. I'm sure I could find more posts like these. Guess I'm not the only one.Â
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Use.