Jump to content

Question

Posted

Following the STEP Core program most users will end up with some Optimized versions of the HDdlc and Vanilla textures.

 

Based on what I know of LOOSE vs BSA, BSA would be better right? I could be TOTALLY wrong on this.

 

Should I repack my HDdlc loose files into a BSA and have MO manage it?

 

Would this hurt the game or help it?

 

Or would this make absolutely no difference at all?

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

If you repack the BSAs you need to use the archive.exe included with CK in your Skyrim folder. DDSopt and BSAopt do not do it correctly with the latest BSA version.

Good to know.

 

But is there any performance gain by doing this?

  • 0
Posted

Well...now Im not sure if that would help me.

 

I think it would...but maybe you know more than me.

 

Here's what I've got:

 

 

40GB SSD - has Skyrim Game

1TB HDD - has MO and all Mods

 

Since MO (I am not 100% on this) virtualizes everything and shows it to Skyrim somehow, I am assuming that the HDD would benefit from the further compression, right?

  • 0
Posted

Probably, if the HRDLC BSAs are packed and put into MO. If they are in the actual data folder then probably not. 40GB is tiny though so any space you save is probably good just for that reason alone.

  • 0
Posted

The "Optimizing Vanilla BSAs" tab in the BSA guide includes the pointer to the thread that fireundubh mentioned. Perhaps this pointer should also be on the last tab.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Use.