TechAngel85 Posted November 24, 2015 Posted November 24, 2015 Mod Organizer 2 is now in alpha, which is the 64-bit version of MO featuring support for Fallout 4. Testers are welcome and encouraged! Download the Alpha here: https://github.com/TanninOne/modorganizer/releases This is not a bug report topic! Please report bugs to the GitHub issue tracker.Thought I'd start this thread for the discussion of MO2 instead of filling the Fallout Support topic with unrelated posts.
0 Gernash Posted July 25, 2016 Posted July 25, 2016 (edited) What's a beta 4? mo2 is at Beta 3 atm Edited July 25, 2016 by Gernash
0 nekollx Posted July 25, 2016 Posted July 25, 2016 thats what i meant the one here https://github.com/TanninOne/modorganizer/releases
0 GrantSP Posted July 25, 2016 Posted July 25, 2016 That is also where you will more likely get an answer with the current beta release. STEP provides active support for MO version 1.3.x but all queries about MO2 should be addressed in @Tannin's repo.
0 JJABRAMS95 Posted August 8, 2016 Posted August 8, 2016 (edited) hello, any idea when next stable version will be released? Edited August 8, 2016 by JJABRAMS95
0 GSDFan Posted August 8, 2016 Posted August 8, 2016 No telling when that will be available. As far as I can tell Tannin has not been on the Github for about a month.
0 othmanarnaout Posted August 20, 2016 Posted August 20, 2016 (edited) The bsa extractor being missing isn't intentional nor final. As you know i moved my repository to github and split it up into smaller repos. The bsa extractor (like all plugins) is now its own repo which i probably forgot to include in the build. Btw.: if anyone feels like adopting this or any other plugin repo, just say the word ;)I know this is a very old post now, but if it is still possible, please try to push this into the release version of MO, it would make life beautiful all over again :)*this* being a bsa/ba2 extractor <3 Edited August 20, 2016 by othmanarnaout
0 Reidlos Posted September 5, 2016 Posted September 5, 2016 If I have 2 Ba2 files and 1 changes 5 things (say textures)(MOD 1) and another before it that changes 10 textures (5 of which are the same as the mod 1) (Mod 2) will the 10 textures be changed then the 5 that are the same in mod 1 overwrite the files from the other? With out the archive tab from the 1.X series I know that loose files win over archives, and archive vs archive is determined by load order of the ESP that goes with it. But I dont recall how well they mesh.
0 Knightblade Posted November 19, 2016 Posted November 19, 2016 I have been using MO2 successfully with SSE. I would like to know if the viewing of save files is correct? Here's why...Looking at certain saves, the popup shows no missing esp files: Other saves show a mass of unreadable characters under "missing ESPs".So, if MO2 isn't reliably handling save files, this could mean nothing. If it IS handling them properly, this could indicate a corrupt save.I think I've narrowed down the cause to the Immersive Amazing Follower Tweaks SSE mod. Anytime I have it active and enter Whiterun, my saves show a lot of unreadable characters under Missing ESPs. I'd like to keep using the mod but need to know if MO2 is telling me it's corrupting my saves.BTW, I'm not seeing any issues with the mod in LOOT or SSEEdit.
0 Greg Posted November 19, 2016 Posted November 19, 2016 This is just an unverified theory, but it sounds as if there may be some differences between the save files created by SSE, Skyrim, and FO4. If this is the case, it could be reading the data incorrectly and showing a stream of gibbersh that it thinks are mod names.
0 tjax323 Posted December 17, 2016 Posted December 17, 2016 (edited) What do the STEP folks make of the recent MO 2.08 version posted to the Nexus yesterday? It appears to have be an easier install without all the workarounds and a team of folks working on it. I initially thought maybe it was hooey, but from reading the posts on the page, it's looking real... I hope. The "author/ group?" on Nexus is a 1 day-old sign-on, which was why I initially thought it was crap. The github for bug trackers appears to have the same "author/group" name responding and s/he references Tannin under the MO github that looks real. I thought perhaps STEP folks might be able to get in touch with Tannin to see if this team is legit. Mod page on Nexus is MO 2.08b. I'm not trying to accuse anyone, but I just want to check it out first before I jump off NMM. Thanks. Sorry if it's a bother, but I'm beginning to get my hopes up. I far prefer MO over NMM until I can see what Tannin does with the new mod manager-- hopefully in 1st half 2017. Edited December 17, 2016 by tjax323
0 TechAngel85 Posted December 17, 2016 Author Posted December 17, 2016 It's legit, but we aren't really looking that far into SSE right now to be able to offer up any advice on it.
0 tjax323 Posted December 17, 2016 Posted December 17, 2016 Thanks, Tech. That at least lets me feel better enough to give it a try. We'll all be switching eventually, and right now I am most comfortable with MO. Thanks for responding.
Question
TechAngel85
Mod Organizer 2 is now in alpha, which is the 64-bit version of MO featuring support for Fallout 4. Testers are welcome and encouraged!
Download the Alpha here: https://github.com/TanninOne/modorganizer/releases
This is not a bug report topic! Please report bugs to the GitHub issue tracker.
Thought I'd start this thread for the discussion of MO2 instead of filling the Fallout Support topic with unrelated posts.
Top Posters For This Question
28
21
16
10
Popular Days
Nov 24
23
Jan 15
14
Dec 27
12
Mar 19
9
Top Posters For This Question
GrantSP 28 posts
TechAngel85 21 posts
GSDFan 16 posts
Greg 10 posts
Popular Days
Nov 24 2015
23 posts
Jan 15 2016
14 posts
Dec 27 2015
12 posts
Mar 19 2016
9 posts
Popular Posts
LePresidente
Hi, My c++ coding is not strong, So i'm doing what I can. My focus is though to get this building using modorganizer-umbrella in a way where a dev can pick up and go instead of jumping through the h
Kesta
Bad news for modaholic with small HDD :/ Looking forward to Tannin's reply on this, I'd like to know if the feature have been removed for technical issue or by design.
Octopuss
I'd like to see the reasoning behind this.
233 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now