Jump to content
  • 0

Question

Posted

May or may not be something new for all of you, but I am personally still trying to get a good estimate of the limits of the skyrim engine. Very hard to find useful information about this anywhere on the internet.  I therefore thought it would be a good idea to open a thread about script mods and to share our experiences with them, in particular how well a combination of mods plays out for you. 

 

What are your thoughts about Skyrim's scripting limitations? At which point do you believe that scripts start to cause unacceptable levels of ctds/freezes (as per your own definitions)? Which combination of script mods could you identify as a likely cause for stability/instability, and why? In what ways do you quantify your maximum allowed number of script mods?

 

Instead of starting by sharing my own experiences, which only go back to about 2 months of Skyrim modding, I suppose one of the best sources to quote for opening this thread is a renowned script mod author himself. About a week ago, Isoku posted some interesting insights with regards to total script load of the skyrim engine.

 

Copy/pasting some of the conversation here for easy reference. Check here for more: https://forums.nexusmods.com/index.php?/topic/844188-wet-and-cold/page-192&do=findComment&comment=9319199

 

observations by domw

 

Although I'm a big fan and once a long-term user of this mod (I quit most script-heavy mods for my latest playthrough,

was spending all my time modding and not even playing, all because of scripting issues), I can absolutely guarantee that it's going to give you stability issues, through no real fault of its own, pretty much as soon as you mix it with any other moderate-to-major script based mod, essentially regardless of your PC's capabilities. This applies to anything that's scripted, not just W&C.

 

It's not really a matter of load count, you could have 254 weapon/armour mods with W&C and probably have flawless stability, but as soon as you introduce anything that is also reliant on either frequent/constant updating, or perhaps batch processing large amounts of data in single cycles, you're gonna have a bad time, purely because Papyrus and its attendant engine were just not *designed* to process all this crap we keep throwing at it. It's like trying to push a salami down a too-small drainpipe (snigger), or a traffic jam on one of those crazy spaghetti junction things.

 

Generally, you want to avoid using multiple "cloak" scripts (a cloak script is essentially a script that's attached to an actor, runs constantly, and has some kind of effect, be it graphical, magical or whatever, like the flame cloak spell, ebony mail enchantment, oakflesh, Footprints, or W&C's wet/snowy effects), as they're specifically troublesome when combined, although in general using scripts that aren't *completely* unrelated in every way is inherently risky.

Running one or two constant cloak scripts is probably okay, but you're still definitely going to CTD occasionally, even with just one.

 

Stuff like Hunterborn and Frostfall's camping equipment placement mechanic is (in my experience) much more stable because it's "contextual" and therefore only runs anything significant when the player performs an action. In my experience, you can quite cheerfully run large amounts of "contextual" scripts as long as they're well written and non-conflicting.

 

However, W&C is pretty modular, so you can disable a lot of stuff to lighten the load and increase the update cycle to further help things, but the best parts (breath, wetness, snowy) are the ones that are the most performance-intensive, so bear that in mind. And disabling stuff isn't an automatic performance improver. But if W&C's going to be your only major script mod, then you're almost definitely good to go.

 

If you're intending to use Frostfall, particularly Frostfall with a needs/desires mod, then I'd seriously consider simply not using W&C, as Frostfall has basic versions of some W&C features, courtesy of Isoku, and combining all three is going to result in a particularly high script load before you've even installed the rest of your setup.

 

Something else to bear in mind: Way, way more mods than you'd think are scripted. And tons of stuff in Vanilla Skyrim is too, so when installing mods, keep an eye on your scripts folder, every time something you install adds a file to that folder, go and stress test until you're confident it's not interfering with anything in a negative way (spawn a bunch of NPCs, trigger a range of weathers, kill some stuff, spam fireballs, fast travel, etc). With W&C specifically, be particularly watchful for a stuck rain effect.

 

Also, don't touch the memory and timing allocations for Papyrus in skyrim.ini unless you're absolutely certain you know what you're doing, allocating too much in the way of resources to the Papyrus engine can potentially cause bucketloads of stack overflows (out of memory) and CTDs even more frequently than if you'd left it alone.

 

 

response by Isoku

 

Thanks for the input domw. Here's my opinion as promised, JohnRandolph:

 

The only feature Get Snowy and Wet and Cold have in common is the snowy effect that covers actors when it's snowing. So yes, Get Snowy is a good alternative if you don't care for the other features of Wet and Cold. Is it more stable? I'm going to say yes to this as well. Because Get Snowy does not utilize scripts and is not as ambitious as Wet and Cold, it will obviously consume less resources and have less potential to impact your experience in a negative way. However, Get Snowy also utilizes a cloaking feature (this is a method to apply modded effects to NPCs in a radius around the player). The presence of a cloaking feature does not indicate that a mod will be troublesome. It's the effects that are applied with it that make the difference.

 

Regarding the stability mod page, I appreciate the author's attempt to share his experience to help improve the game for others. Although I agree with some of his selections in blacklisted mods (those that are outdated and no longer supported) and I agree that users should exercise caution when using multiple script intensive mods, I am a bit disappointed in the broad brush stroke used to paint every fully featured, scripted mod as ticking time bombs. Scripted/cloaking mods are not inherently prone to failure purely based on the size of your load order. One must take into account the complexity of the mod in question, how efficiently it was coded, how well it's supported, the presence of other scripted mods and the relative performance of your computer. For example, I am hesitant to recommend Player Headtracking because it appears to be buggy and is no longer supported by the author. I would recommend Footprints because of the relative simplicity of its scripts and scope. I would not recommend running Player Headtracking, Enhanced Blood Textures, Frostfall, Footprints, Wet and Cold, SkyRE and other highly scripted mods at the same time.

 

That said I want to state a few things about Wet and Cold since I know it inside and out:

 

1. The only script that is continuously running regardless of your exterior location is the one that simply checks which worldspace you are in and the current time. This script is disabled in interiors--the entire mod gets disabled in interiors. 90% of the checks introduced through this mod is done through magic effect conditions, which is not as demanding as checks done through scripting. I use magic effect conditions to monitor weather, NPC type, specific locations, etc.

 

2. The majority of the other scripts in this mod are pretty simple. They simply turn on, execute what they were meant to do, then turn off. One exception to this is the breath effect, which updates every few seconds to play the visual effect in a loop. However the scripts related to the breath effect get disabled when the actor is more than 1024 units from you and when you are no longer in a cold region.

 

3. I consider the equipment features the most resource intensive since I'm rolling several dice in order to randomize the equipment on an NPC. The visual effects are fairly light weight.

 

3. Imagine Wet and Cold as a collection of mods rather than one. Let's say it is the equivalent of ten lightly scripted mods. Do you think your system can run these along with your other scripted mods taking into account what I stated in the second paragraph? If not, disabling one or two features from Wet and Cold is essentially the equivalent of disabling one of these ten mods.

 

For what it's worth, I have a high-end system, am running several (only several! ) highly scripted mods including Wet and Cold (with most of the features enabled) and have had no problems. However, I am very careful with the mods I install.

Edited by isoku, 29 September 2013 - 10:45 AM. 

 

 

comments by ploeperpengel

 

This conversation deserves a sticky(feel free to remove my petty comment for that). Taking Wet and Cold from my current Modlist was one of the hardest decisions I made during the last couple of weeks were I experienced constant ILS and ctds(due to overmodding and not particularly this mod, but I had to reduce the amount of scripts). This new changelog however looks very promising and I'm totally interested to test this again.

 

Just some additional -questionable- observations(I'm fairly new to Skyrim Modding same as the OP - cheers Randolph btw! - and I don't know nothing about proper interpunction as this isn't my native language so please bear with me).

 

In my earlier testbuild I had Inconsequental NPCs, Interesting NPCs, Headtracking, When Vampires Attack, Run for your lifes, Frostfall, RND, Wet and Cold and Skyrim Immersive creatures all running at the same time. Meaning I had multiple cloak spell scripts constantly checking player condition, scripts checking for NPCs in the area, altering NPC behavior dependend on conditions(Weather, Attacks etc) and on top of that put a shitload of additional actors into the game. I guess it's no big surprise my game bugged out completly at some point starting with scenes not playing or having actors missing during scenes and more and more freezes, ctds and ILS with the game progressing.

 

After two months of testing mods I'm also quite eager by now to hopefully be able to play the game soon and not just test it(have yet to play Dragonborn, Dawnguard and finish the mainquest actually even though I've spend literally several months in Skyrim already right there when it was first published, not without ctds of course even without mods).

 

I will probably no longer use headtracking even though I liked it and I'm thinking about making important actors essential with Deadly Dragons instead of using Run for your lifes and When Vampires attack, Dragons and Vampires can kill whatever inconsequental NPCs they want to for all I care. However the remaining mods still seem like a lot for the engine so I'd really be interested what experiences other poeple had with running those or similar mods together. My goal is obviously to loose as few as possible of the remaining mods I have mentioned above and any offered experiences with this are really appreciated(as long they're not simply based on nerdrage).

 

In any case this mod is definitly endorsed. Now lets hope I can actually play with it longer:D 

 

 

Edit: updated with correct Isoku post

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

I will personally let you know which mods will cause CTD/Freezes.

 

Burn Freeze Shock : Has been proven by STEP/Nexus members alike that this mod does cause freezes/CTD.

 

Deadly Spell Impact : Skyrims engine does not seem to like high res decals which was stated by the author isoku. (However, this mod does work 100% if you delete the esp and use the medium version)

 

Warzones Civil Unrest: Abandoned and has alot of dirty edits which causes the game to be unstable. Proven to CTD your game.

 

I have many more, but will add them later because of time constraints at the moment.

 

Regarding script latency, I would recommend Convenient Horses as it includes a script tester which will run in the background to see how heavy your script use is.

I have talked with the author through Personal Message, and he has stated from our conversation that keeping the script latency below 100 would be recommended.

  • 0
Posted

Pretty much everything there is not new. Its more or less the conclusion we have arrived at here over the past few months.

Still a good read.

One thing I found really interesting, and one that I have spent a bit of time trying to investigate is that of adding more stuff to the games leveled lists.

Originally I thought that would not be a big deal, but ofc. the larger the list the more complex the computation to equip all NPC´s etc.

I know many people like immersive armors, and weapons and Jz´s Swords etc. And I have noted a few cases where the game got more stable after they where removed. Granted this was mainly in relation to ILS and general loading issues.

I personally do not use any added armors or weapons etc. since I honestly think the game has enough already.

I can understand that SkyRe users kinda must, so its even more vital that they also keep this in mind.

  • 0
Posted

@Deathwing: Yeah I've read and known about those mods for some time. Removed BFS and DSI from mod list long ago. Never had Warzones because so many people report issues with it. The script latency feature is nice and I've been using it, but I am not entirely sure that latency by itself is a good indication of stability, though it can help. Some scripts conflict, overlap or simply apply too many different things to an npc causing the game to crash. What is nice about the CH function though, is that right after loading a game it display a high script latency (usualyl between 400 and 700ms on my install) from which I suppose one can derive the proper setting for the papyrus fPostLoadUpdateTimeMS=x setting.

 

@Aiyen, indeed and like I said in the OP, a lot of these things are not new for you and many experienced others. But there is not 1 central point of information about this, even though script mods are the topic of a vast amount of issues here. I think it would be a good idea, for both the more experienced/knowledgable and the less, to have one topic with a compilation of known possible issues with a certain script mod or a combination of such mods. In my view, such a compilation would not try to portray absolute solutions or answers, but would rather be more like a collection of informed opinions/experiences/knowledge about running several script mods simultaneously. It would also extend to leveled lists and to cloaking feature stability issues.

 

I would like to work on this thread and to continuously make changes to the OP, so that it gradually becomes more like a guide and/or base of reference for readers. I'll collect information in the next few days and add it to the OP.

  • 0
Posted

Sounds like a nice plan.

The only issue I could have with it is like Isoku says. The mods work flawlessly on their own, or with smaller setups. But once you start to just pour them on then it becomes an issue. Hence one has to be careful not to say that mod A is horrible and a liability script wise.

Some mods are just horrible in terms of optimization, but most of those are also not supported anymore.

 

With respect to Deadly Spell Impacts. I found that just reducing the decal textures to 512x512 removes just about all my magic freezes. As soon as they are 1k or above then the freezes become prominent again. For this reason I still have it in my list.

I am considering if I want convenient horses at all atm. Since I do not use any fancy follower mods, and as I understand it you can still ride around on a horse without the mod.

  • 0
Posted

Sounds like a nice plan.

The only issue I could have with it is like Isoku says. The mods work flawlessly on their own, or with smaller setups. But once you start to just pour them on then it becomes an issue. Hence one has to be careful not to say that mod A is horrible and a liability script wise.

Some mods are just horrible in terms of optimization, but most of those are also not supported anymore.

I completely agree with this and I will never make it a platform for mod-bashing or stating that a particular mod is bad. I'll always respect the mod authors and their intentions to improve upon the game.

 

I'm thinking that I may start off by categorizing the mods according to their perceived risk to stability. For example in my MO, I have 3 categories for script mods: low risk, medium risk and high risk. The risk assesment is based on both subjective and objective factors, for instance script update frequency/overall intensity, amount of scripts, issue reports on nexus/step forums, whether additional NPC behaviour/content is added (through e.g. worldspace edits/spawns/NPC spells etc.) or whether it merely edits a vanilla skyrim script, etc. etc.

 

I have already made notes for certain mods. To come back to Wet and Cold as an example, due to its modular nature it can be an extremely light-weight mod if you turn only 1 non-SKSE feature on and leave the rest disabled but it can be quite a high risk factor (as indicated by the author himself) if all the modules are turned on - in particular the SKSE dependent ones such as NPC clothing. Therefore, although a mod can be placed in the high (or I might name it 'higher' in order not to give the reader the idea that the mod is inherently unstable) risk category, I will attach my own notes, user's (i.e. your) notes and when available comments of the mod developer. 

 

To give some more indications, here's a small selection of my mods and how I have classified them:

 

Lower risk: Appropriately Attired Jarls, Dual Wield Parrying, Auto Unequip Ammo, 101Bugs.

Medium risk: Run for Your Lives, Lighting During Thunder Storms (papyrus log spamming errors for multiple users, otherwise works fine), Achieve That, Immersive Patrols (depending on which modules installed).

Higher risk: Interesting NPCs, Skyrim Redone, SkyTEST, SIC (if additional spawns enabled, otherwise medium risk), AV, ASIS, Organized Bandits.

 

Everything is open to discussion; what I put in the OP is my suggestion and I'll be glad to hear criticism about a particular mod's category. I'll have to further define the categories and the requirements.

 

Another idea I have is to develop a conceptual package which serves as the framework for analysis. It can be assumed that most users have 1 perk overhaul/combat mod (SkyRe, SPERG, ACE , Duel etc.), 2-4 NPC-affecting mods (GDO, Run for your lives, Cloaks of Skyrim, Wet and Cold/Get Snowy, Banodlier for NPCS, Lanterns for Guards, SIC/SkyTest, Traps make Noise etc.) and another 2-4 miscellaneous mods (Dance of Death, Face to Face conversation, AutoPV, Gildergreen Regrown etc.). Any particular mod will then be judged based on how well it would potentially run within such a framework. 

  • 0
Posted

Hello all, scripted mods have been a concern of mine lately, and I wanted to both say I'd love to see some sort of rating system in place, even if somewhat subjective. I know this thread is a little older but I found it while trying to find if ALL the scripted mods listed in STEP Core are really feasible to combine.

 

I am an immersion player mostly, to give you an idea of where I'm coming from.

 

Notably:

101 Bugs (I assume scripted)

Convenient Horses

Dual Sheath Redux (I assume scripted)

Footprints

Gildergreen Regrown

Rainbows

Run for Your Lives

Shooting Stars

Skyrim Uncapper

Wearable Lanterns

Wet and Cold (I KNOW it's very script intensive, it's pretty much a must-have for me though)

When Vampires Attack

 

You list even more than this (I assume quest changes and such are scripted) but these are mods I am most interested in.

 

And of those not listed, not installed, but that I've tested:

Amazing Follower Tweaks (I actually want to use followers with this thing, I assume heavily scripted)

Frostfall I am missing terribly in a test save

Dragon Combat Overhaul was my wussie alternative to Deadly Dragons (I like the physics of it)

Skybirds (Why is Birds and Flocks recommended over this?)

Skyrealism: Time and Travel (I DO have this installed, but it should only run a quick script when first entering an area)

Realistic Needs and Diseases (I DO also have this installed, not leaving my load order)

 

 

A few other questions. Do perk overhauls like Enchanting Awakened/Speech overhauls/Stealth Skills Rebalanced fit into the "scripted" category? What about Dynamic Snow and Mossrocks type stuff?

 

Maybe even more than a "risk" rating a "is scripted, lightly scripted, heavily scripted" etc. rating would be more useful? Another tangentally related guide I couldn't find (but would love to read) is, what savegame sizes are reasonable for hours played? (to help detect savegame bloating). I have used the realism/survival mods together for a good portion of a playthrough and didn't feel like I was encountering any real issues, except for occasional stuttering. I see the "Skyrim Revisited" encorporates these and even more. I don't want to get 50-100 hours in and find I have to start over, though.

 

I know I'm asking a lot. :) Any insight offered would be appreciated.

  • 0
Posted

Scripts usually only trigger under certain circumstances. Some mods call regularily on Scripts (frostfall, wetncold). In General the Game gets LEss stable the more Scripts are called in at the Same Time ( Combat).

  • 0
Posted

I personally do not use any added armors or weapons etc. since I honestly think the game has enough already.

 

Yes I agree, there's too much stuff in the game already, I just try to pretty up what is there.  So I don't use any mods that add new items to the game either.

 

This is the first I've heard of problems with too many items though.  Interesting.  So now I've added a 5th general category to my list of problems that cause CTDs:

 

1.  Too many Scripts

2.  Too many Spawns

3.  Too many HD textures

4.  Badly written or conflicting mods

5.  Too many items!

  • 0
Posted

Footprints

...

Wet and Cold (I KNOW it's very script intensive, it's pretty much a must-have for me though)

...

Amazing Follower Tweaks (I actually want to use followers with this thing, I assume heavily scripted)

Frostfall I am missing terribly in a test save

...

Skybirds (Why is Birds and Flocks recommended over this?)

...

Realistic Needs and Diseases (I DO also have this installed, not leaving my load order)

 

 

As torminator stated, it's the scripts that run constantly that will give you the most problems.  You could have 10,000 scripts installed and have no problems at all as long as they are event driven and not too many are triggered for a specific event.

 

For example, Wet and Cold, Frostfall, and RnD in your list run scripts constantly.  Why?  Because they have to constantly check the environment you're in and how close you are to wet or cold or fire, and how sleepy you are, etc.  Do I use these mods myself?  ABSOLUTELY.  I wouldn't play the game without them.  But I've also LESSENED the number of scripts in Wet and Cold by UNchecking some of its options in the MCM.  Since I always play first person why should I need to see the snow or ashes on my character?  So here's what I've disabled:

  • Wet
Drips:  Disabled (for Player and NPCs)

Soggy Feet:  Disabled (for Player and NPCs)

  • Cold
Breaths:  Disabled (for Player and NPCs)

Snowy:  Disabled (for Player and NPCs)

  • Ashes
Dusty:  Disabled (for Player and NPCs)

  • System
Heat Detection:  Disabled

Shelter Detection:  Disabled

Cloak Spell:  Disabled

 

Regarding Footprints in your list...  Can you do without this?  I LOVE Footprints too, but I removed it because I play in first person mod, so I don't care about seeing other people's footprints, nor do I care about seeing my horse's footprints.

 

Regarding SkyBirds in your list...  I love that mod and I played with it for a while until I got my first game CTDs.  Read through the posts in the mod and see the directions for uninstalling it, that will give you a clue.  :ermm:

 

I use AFT and love it. I used to use UFO but I found AFT to work better and it seems more compatible with special followers like Inigo.

 

Lastly let me say that you really have to decide what you like most in the game, and concentrate only on that and lose the other stuff.  For me I like playability, that is I want to be able to DO more things in the game.  So SkyTest got dropped from my game early on because it doesn't offer more playability (except maybe for the animal AI when fighting).  In its place I've added more quest mods.  In fact I bet I have more questing mods installed than all of you.  :P

  • 0
Posted

Right, I understand Wet/Cold, Frostfall and RND must run at least SOME scripts pretty much constantly. I tried dropping Frostfall and just camping out myself, but it's not quite the same =/ Unfortunately I usually only zoom in to first-person in combat and I do a lot of poking around places so turning off frost/wet effects would be a wrench for me.

 

What I was kinda trying to get a feel for is whether, with those 3 mods, I'm going to eventually implode my game if I also use those mods I listed (not Skybirds, that was just a question). I mean, Skyrim Revisited uses them and even some I'm afraid of (Deadly Spell Impacts), some that sound cool but I can definitely live without (such as SkyTest, Player Headtracking), and it's obvious by the detail of the guide that the author is not a noob.

  • 0
Posted

Thanks for recommending convenient horses. I was holding out for that one because I was afraid of its scripts, but tried it just for measuring latency and checking logs for errors. With JUST CH I got a latency of about 49. I threw wet and cold at it and it went up to 50 on average. Then for the heck of it I threw in enhanced blood, footsteps AND frostfall. Flew around in god mode, turned into a vampire lord, slaughtered a whole village, stole a bunch of horses and fast travelled back and forth all over the map. Latency spikes were about 150ms but average was still at 50-60. In fact the most intensive thing seems to be turning into a vampire lord during the turning animation. Firing shots felt also a tad bit delayed, but I remember vanilla was about the same.

 

Conclusion? W&C, CH and EBT are now permanent in my mod list.

 

Thanks

Fred

 

 

PS I'll also have to add that I'm using Skylight ENB, turning it OFF shaved my latency down to an average of 36ms, much more than turning off scripted mods all together, with other words. DS

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Use.