No doubt the answer will depend on individual systems but xlod and dyndolod have many extensive options, but I'd like to try to eek out a bit more performance if I can.
I am currently using 512 across the board for texgen, xlodgen (lod 16 and 32 is 256) and dyndolod... is there any screen shots that compare 256 vs 512 vs 1024 ?
Question
Soulmancer
No doubt the answer will depend on individual systems but xlod and dyndolod have many extensive options, but I'd like to try to eek out a bit more performance if I can.
I am currently using 512 across the board for texgen, xlodgen (lod 16 and 32 is 256) and dyndolod... is there any screen shots that compare 256 vs 512 vs 1024 ?
I do use this as well https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/3333
I am using the performance friendly version of 512, which probably makes the most sense since I am 512 elsewhere for the most part.
With regards to xlodgen how much difference does the "quality" value make on performance vs quality? currently I am 4/8/12/12.
Lastly I used this article for ultra trees https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/articles/570
Obviously the lod 4 to static lod 4 for trees is the important. Is changing the near lod to far lod though also important as this article suggests?
My ultra 3d trees look awesome, but seems like a 5-10 fps hit on my system using that article settings (I use EVT custom small vanilla branches)
Edited by SoulmancerLink to comment
Share on other sites
14 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now