STEP:Extended Proposal/Utilities: Difference between revisions
TechAngel85 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→Votes) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==== Votes ==== | ==== Votes ==== | ||
{{ | {{yes|yellow}} I prefer this in a Utilities Pack. [[User:DoubleYou|DoubleYou]] ([[User talk:DoubleYou|talk]]) 23:37, February 25, 2014 (EST) | ||
== [[ConSkrybe]] == | == [[ConSkrybe]] == | ||
Revision as of 04:58, February 26, 2014
I just want to start by saying that I don't see any issue listing "STEP approved" utilities on either Guide. They are tools rather than mods so have them all in a Pack (to be install on top of Core) doesn't really make much sense. List them on the STEP Guide and pointing to their individual guides make more sense to me. Else, if dropped, they may not ever get mentioned at all and many user may not ever know of their value. Techangel85 (talk) 23:56, February 25, 2014 (EST)
BOSS Userlist Manager
Votes
Template:Yes I prefer this in a Utilities Pack. DoubleYou (talk) 23:37, February 25, 2014 (EST)
ConSkrybe
Votes
Template:No I prefer this in a Utilities Pack. DoubleYou (talk) 23:39, February 25, 2014 (EST)
DDSopt
Votes
Template:No I prefer this in a Utilities Pack. DoubleYou (talk) 23:39, February 25, 2014 (EST)
Optimizer Textures
Votes
Template:No DDSopt is preferable. DoubleYou (talk) 23:39, February 25, 2014 (EST)
Skyrim Performance Monitor
Votes
Template:No I prefer this in a Utilities Pack. DoubleYou (talk) 23:39, February 25, 2014 (EST)
TES5Edit
Votes
Template:Yes I prefer this in Core. DoubleYou (talk) 23:39, February 25, 2014 (EST)
