I am seeing a big difference with loading times (time spent on the loading screens) with ENB graphics enabled vs. not. When I disable graphics enhancements, that is set UsePatchSpeedhackWithoutGraphics=true, I get 5-6sec loading times. However, if I set that to false to enable graphics, I see a huge increase @roughly 20-30sec. I wanted to see if this disparity was expected and if there is something I could do to reduce it. Possibly useful information on my setup: Graphics Card: GTX 980 with latest drivers. 4GB VRAM. Max VRAM used when loading 3.2GB. ENBLocal.ini: https://pastebin.com/PaRSNPLX SweetFX: Default settings. Enabled increases loading times by a 4-5sec. Doesn't affect framerate by more than 1 or 2. ENB Preset: Natural Lighting and Atmospherics without any modifications. A Few Relavent Mods: With ELFX, Realistic Water 2, Tamriel Reloaded HD 4K, aMidianBorn Book of Silence, True Storms, and High Quality LODs. I can provide a full list upon request. Mod Manager: Mod Organizer. I am getting ~40fps normally with my setup (many 4K textures @1440p in a borderless window). I am surprised ENB is having such a large impact. Even the getting the main menu (from launch) is taking 5-10sec extra. Returning to skyrim after a while and this is my first setup with ENB and higher resolution graphics so any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Edit: Forgot to mention I checked task manager and nothing stands out. With or without ENB graphics I see more or less the same: 10-30% CPU Utilizaton; Reading mod files off the disk. TESV.exe commit is <800MB and ENBHost.exe with ~1.6GB. Edit2: Another thing I forgot, this is win10. I didn't have skyrim before upgrading to win10 so I unfortunately don't have any reference numbers. I haven't had any issues with win10 though.