Booshki

My fault, have overlooked that SRO is already optimized. But the Vano89 pack is still confusing me somehow, since I already optimized the HRDLC 1~3 as said in the SRLE Guide (1k Normal Maps), there shouldnt be any real difference on the VRAM load, but after making a 3 Profile in MO just for testing purpose I was getting different VRAM numbers.For Example, my Skyrim with SKSE, Cleaned Vanilla ESMs and the Optimized Folders (Textures, Dawnguard, HRDLC1 etc etc) in the New Game Opening scene was giving me a max VRAM load of ~1010, with the Vano89 pack installed last (so it overwrites files in the HRDLC) I was getting a max VRAM load of ~950, for Vano89's Pack I was using this Option "Hybrid (1024+2048) + Hi-Res Secondary Stuff", so a small amount less VRAM use then before, so I was thinking that there are eventually some conflicts, that Vanos pack overwrites wrong files that are needed for SRLE maybe?

I'm new to Skyrim Revisited but I've got a question, I hope this wasn't answered somewhere already (couldnt find it via search). After reading through STEP and Revisited, following every step in Revisited my Skyrim was looking great, but I had some stuttering here and there, due VRAM issues and the VRAM was always around ~2010MB and sometimes even at maximum (Whiterun, Whindhelm or areas with a lot of Fog), there wasn't any CTD tho. My question now, I know Skyrim Revisited is made for some of the beefier systems out there (especialy when I see the system of Neovalan), but would it be possible to reduce the VRAM usage a bit if I use "Bethesda Hi-Res DLC Optimized - by Vano89" or would this mod package add more conflicts with Skyrim Revisited then needed, like overwriting the wrong textures or something? And could I DDSopt some of the more taxing graphic mods too (was thinking about Skyrim Realistic Overhaul) to reduce the VRAM usage a bit more? Playing Skyrim at 1920x1080 on a Single GTX 660ti 2GB with Skyrim installed on a SSD.