Project talk:Data Dictionary: Difference between revisions
From Step Mods | Change The Game
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
*: {{Fc|white|Comment: The flag is somewhat problematic since it applies only to textures and can be hard to verify especially for non-core mods. Moreover, we may still want to separately optimize/reoptimize the normal maps even if the color map textures are adequately optimized.}} ~[[User:Kelmych|Kelmych]] [[User talk:Kelmych|Talk]] 12:26, July 16, 2013 | *: {{Fc|white|Comment: The flag is somewhat problematic since it applies only to textures and can be hard to verify especially for non-core mods. Moreover, we may still want to separately optimize/reoptimize the normal maps even if the color map textures are adequately optimized.}} ~[[User:Kelmych|Kelmych]] [[User talk:Kelmych|Talk]] 12:26, July 16, 2013 | ||
*:: {{Fc|white|I think that this is a good flag for things that really should not be run through DDSopt for whatever reason. We can change the property and tag names easily enough if necessary.}} ~[[User:z929669|z929669]] [[File:Ixian_Insignia.png|25px|link=User:z929669]] [[User talk:z929669|Talk]] 15:21, July 16, 2013 (MDT) | *:: {{Fc|white|I think that this is a good flag for things that really should not be run through DDSopt for whatever reason. We can change the property and tag names easily enough if necessary.}} ~[[User:z929669|z929669]] [[File:Ixian_Insignia.png|25px|link=User:z929669]] [[User talk:z929669|Talk]] 15:21, July 16, 2013 (MDT) | ||
*:: {{Fc|white|What should we do if the color map textures are optimized but the normal maps are too large. Should there be tgwo flags, or just ignore the normal map issues? [[User:Kelmych|Kelmych]] ([[User talk:Kelmych|talk]]) 21:11, July 16, 2013 (MDT) | *:: {{Fc|white|What should we do if the color map textures are optimized but the normal maps are too large. Should there be tgwo flags, or just ignore the normal map issues?}} [[User:Kelmych|Kelmych]] ([[User talk:Kelmych|talk]]) 21:11, July 16, 2013 (MDT) | ||
* {{Fc|#e6b69e|'''''HasSKSE'''''}} (Boolean) - Indicates that the mod depends on SKSE. | * {{Fc|#e6b69e|'''''HasSKSE'''''}} (Boolean) - Indicates that the mod depends on SKSE. | ||
* {{Fc|#e6b69e|'''''HasMCM'''''}} (Boolean) - Indicates that the mod has MCM functionality and depends on SkyUI. | * {{Fc|#e6b69e|'''''HasMCM'''''}} (Boolean) - Indicates that the mod has MCM functionality and depends on SkyUI. | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
*:: {{Fc|white|Only Vano89's mod positively impacts performance, so this really denotes a negative impact.}} ~[[User:z929669|z929669]] [[File:Ixian_Insignia.png|25px|link=User:z929669]] [[User talk:z929669|Talk]] 15:25, July 16, 2013 (MDT) | *:: {{Fc|white|Only Vano89's mod positively impacts performance, so this really denotes a negative impact.}} ~[[User:z929669|z929669]] [[File:Ixian_Insignia.png|25px|link=User:z929669]] [[User talk:z929669|Talk]] 15:25, July 16, 2013 (MDT) | ||
*::: {{Fc|white|But that might not be true for much longer, what if someone made a "craptastic computer pack", it might be nice to know that a mod has a positive effect. I think a choice of positive/none/negative would be well suited.}} ~[[User:Farlo|Farlo]][[File:User Farlo Sig.png|19px|link=User:Farlo]]<small>[[User talk:Farlo|Talk]]</small> 18:20, July 16, 2013 (MDT) | *::: {{Fc|white|But that might not be true for much longer, what if someone made a "craptastic computer pack", it might be nice to know that a mod has a positive effect. I think a choice of positive/none/negative would be well suited.}} ~[[User:Farlo|Farlo]][[File:User Farlo Sig.png|19px|link=User:Farlo]]<small>[[User talk:Farlo|Talk]]</small> 18:20, July 16, 2013 (MDT) | ||
*::: {{Fc|white|I was thinking about relative improvements compared to some STEP baseline, in which case a mod that reduces quality a small amount but improves FPS a lot might get a positive check here. Skyrim Performance Plus would certainly get a plus here also. [[User:Kelmych|Kelmych]] ([[User talk:Kelmych|talk]]) 21:11, July 16, 2013 (MDT) | *::: {{Fc|white|I was thinking about relative improvements compared to some STEP baseline, in which case a mod that reduces quality a small amount but improves FPS a lot might get a positive check here. Skyrim Performance Plus would certainly get a plus here also.}} [[User:Kelmych|Kelmych]] ([[User talk:Kelmych|talk]]) 21:11, July 16, 2013 (MDT) | ||
* {{Fc|#e6b69e|'''''AffectsVRAM'''''}} (Boolean) - Indicates if a mod has a noticeable VRAM impact. | * {{Fc|#e6b69e|'''''AffectsVRAM'''''}} (Boolean) - Indicates if a mod has a noticeable VRAM impact. | ||
*: {{Fc|white|[See above]}} | *: {{Fc|white|[See above]}} | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
*: {{Fc|white|Proposed: s4n suggested adding capability to set flags (plus mod IDs) to note conflicts.}} | *: {{Fc|white|Proposed: s4n suggested adding capability to set flags (plus mod IDs) to note conflicts.}} | ||
*:* {{Fc|#9eb6e6|'''''Conflicts'''''}} {{Fc|white|(?) - Figure out some method to denote salient conflicts of ''particular'' interest.}} | *:* {{Fc|#9eb6e6|'''''Conflicts'''''}} {{Fc|white|(?) - Figure out some method to denote salient conflicts of ''particular'' interest.}} | ||
*:* {{Fc|white|how about a list of important conflicts using the STEP mod index in the list [[User:Kelmych|Kelmych]] ([[User talk:Kelmych|talk]]) 21:11, July 16, 2013 (MDT) | *:* {{Fc|white|how about a list of important conflicts using the STEP mod index in the list}} [[User:Kelmych|Kelmych]] ([[User talk:Kelmych|talk]]) 21:11, July 16, 2013 (MDT) | ||
= Packs = | = Packs = |
Revision as of 03:12, July 17, 2013
New Properties for STEP Guides - WIP (Discussion Page)[edit source]
Following is a work-in-progress list of current and proposed attributes that can be associated with mod pages. Feel free to add anything you might think is useful. Let's try to keep it organized, so group similar or related properties as best you can. Note that Baseline has been removed from this list on purpose, that should be a Pack attribute based on the Pack's guidelines. ~FarloTalk 19:56, July 15, 2013 (MDT)