Project:Data Dictionary/Proposals: Difference between revisions
From Step Mods | Change The Game
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:~[[User:z929669|z929669]][[File:Ixian_Insignia.png|30px|link=User:z929669]][[User talk:z929669|Talk]] 21:00, November 27, 2012 (UTC) | :~[[User:z929669|z929669]][[File:Ixian_Insignia.png|30px|link=User:z929669]][[User talk:z929669|Talk]] 21:00, November 27, 2012 (UTC) | ||
: Yes to the Documentation properties. There should only be three (the ones currently designated as sub properties) all of type boolean. | : * Yes to the Documentation properties. There should only be three (the ones currently designated as sub properties) all of type boolean. | ||
: * Per the talk last night, SystemSpecs will be queried for the user entering PerformanceData and subsequently stored on the report page for that PerformanceData. Beyond this, we'll need a query that can pull results from the PerformanceData entered and process accordingly. Still not sure on how we're going to do that. | |||
: [[User:Stoppingby4now|Stoppingby4now]] ([[User talk:Stoppingby4now|talk]]) 23:42, November 27, 2012 (UTC) | : [[User:Stoppingby4now|Stoppingby4now]] ([[User talk:Stoppingby4now|talk]]) 23:42, November 27, 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:45, November 27, 2012
Propose that we add to Template:ModTest:
- RunningDawnguard (Boolean) - Indicates that the test box is running Dawnguard
- RunningHearthfire (Boolean) - Indicates that the test box is running Hearthfire
- RunningDragonborn (Boolean) - Indicates that the test box is running Dragonborn
RE Template:ModAttributes:
- @s4n, should the internal objects of the Documentation property be converted to property "string" values of that property? Could you re-create that one as you see fit?
- Should we add the QualityImpact property to the end of this?
We should rename Template:PerformanceImpact to Template:PerformanceData and use the previous name to hold the performance result (i.e., "impact")
RE Template:SystemSpecs & Template PerformanceData:
- How can we set these to evaluate to the SystemType and PerformanceImpact Properties, respectively? These can either evaluate directly in a 1:1 or in aggregate as a query result of the "average" of these respective templates ...
- * Yes to the Documentation properties. There should only be three (the ones currently designated as sub properties) all of type boolean.
- * Per the talk last night, SystemSpecs will be queried for the user entering PerformanceData and subsequently stored on the report page for that PerformanceData. Beyond this, we'll need a query that can pull results from the PerformanceData entered and process accordingly. Still not sure on how we're going to do that.
- Stoppingby4now (talk) 23:42, November 27, 2012 (UTC)