DROPPED Deadly Spell Impacts Transparency Fix for ENB (by Korodic and Daralima)

[Greg]

Discussion topic:
Deadly Spell Impacts Transparency Fix for ENB by Korodic and Daralima
Wiki Link

 

---

No longer needed with SSE ENB v0.484 or higher.

[z929669]

Seems like a no brainer

[Mercury71]

I am with z here. Se below pictures (STEP 2.0 with ENB).

[Greg]

I agree this is a good one for the guide. I had to let my eyes adjust to screenshots in mod description before I saw the squares/rectangles around the impacts.

[z929669]

15 hours ago, Mercury71 said:

I am with z here. Se below pictures (STEP 2.0 with ENB).

What is the diff between these two shots? ENB/No ENB?

Either way, it's good, and a good example of why we should have an ENB. Snow in Skyrim sucks without it, IMO. Same for water to a lesser extent.

[z929669]

@Greg Unable to check right now, but I don't want to forget: Is this working as intended with all of our new meshes this iteration? I know it's a plugin, but I don't know if it is relying on vanilla meshes or not.

If working as expected, I vote to accept.

[Greg]

This one overrides DecalsSnowHole01 and DecalSnowMelt01 to change TX03 - Glow/Detail Map from nothing to black.dds. Nothing else is changed and it does not include any assets (meshes or textures), so it uses the existing meshes and textures.

[z929669]

We can leave this in 09-Fixes, but since it only applies to ENB, it may be better classified into the Post-Processing ModGroup, since it isn't needed otherwise.

Opinions?

[Mercury71]

36 minutes ago, z929669 said:

We can leave this in 09-Fixes, but since it only applies to ENB, it may be better classified into the Post-Processing ModGroup, since it isn't needed otherwise.

Opinions?

Put it in Post-processing. Some people prefer no ENB or a Reshade.

[z929669]

Tagged Accepted, changed to Post-Processing, added to ModList/changelog, etc.

[z929669]

This mod is no longer necessary when using SSE ENB v0.484 or higher. I've been testing with ENB v0.502.

Tagging 'dropped' for 2.3